Literature DB >> 1354734

Anorectic activity of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in rats: relationship between brain concentrations and in-vitro potencies on monoaminergic mechanisms.

S Caccia1, A Bizzi, G Coltro, C Fracasso, E Frittoli, T Mennini, S Garattini.   

Abstract

The present study was aimed at establishing the importance of brain monoamine uptake and release mechanisms in the anorectic activity of fluoxetine, relating them to the actual brain concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolite norfluoxetine after anorectic doses in rats. Both compounds showed anorectic activity when administered intraperitoneally, norfluoxetine being slightly more active (ED50 = 22.9 mumol kg-1) than fluoxetine (ED50 = 35.0 mumol kg-1) despite the fact that the metabolite is about ten times less potent than the parent drug in inhibiting 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake. Comparing the brain concentrations of norfluoxetine, in terms of maximum concentrations (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC), after the ED50 of fluoxetine or synthetic norfluoxetine, it also appeared that the metabolite plays a major role in the anorectic effect of the parent drug in rats. Brain Cmax of fluoxetine (48.7 microM) and norfluoxetine (21.7 and 27.3 microM after metabolite and drug, respectively) were several times those blocking 5-HT uptake in-vitro (0.5 microM), making it unlikely that fluoxetine (directly or through its metabolite) reduces food intake by specifically blocking 5-HT neuronal uptake. Brain Cmax of fluoxetine but particularly norfluoxetine were more compatible with those capable in-vitro of affecting catecholaminergic mechanisms, such as inhibition of dopamine and noradrenaline uptake and enhancement of dopamine release. These results together with recent in-vitro findings that the parent compound and its active metabolite induce tritium release from hippocampal synaptosomes previously loaded with [3H]5-HT suggest that mechanisms other than inhibition of 5-HT uptake are involved in the anorectic action of these compounds in rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1354734     DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1992.tb03592.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol        ISSN: 0022-3573            Impact factor:   3.765


  8 in total

1.  Fluoxetine prevents 8-OH-DPAT-induced hyperphagia in Fischer inbred rats.

Authors:  Chandra Suma Johnson Miryala; Navin Maswood; Lynda Uphouse
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Fluoxetine-elicited changes in brain neurosteroid content measured by negative ion mass fragmentography.

Authors:  D P Uzunov; T B Cooper; E Costa; A Guidotti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effects of single and repeated anorectic doses of 5-hydroxytryptamine uptake inhibitors on indole levels in rat brain.

Authors:  S Caccia; M Anelli; A M Codegoni; C Fracasso; S Garattini
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Modest effects of repeated fluoxetine on estrous cyclicity and sexual behavior in Sprague Dawley female rats.

Authors:  Navin Maswood; Jhimly Sarkar; Lynda Uphouse
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Fluoxetine at anorectic doses does not have properties of a dopamine uptake inhibitor.

Authors:  R W Fuller; S K Hemrick-Luecke; H D Snoddy
Journal:  J Neural Transm Gen Sect       Date:  1994

6.  Daily male exposure attenuates estrous cycle disruption by fluoxetine.

Authors:  Jhimly Sarkar; Cindy Hiegel; Navin Maswood; Lynda Uphouse
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Chronic citalopram administration causes a sustained suppression of serotonin synthesis in the mouse forebrain.

Authors:  Gerard Honig; Minke E Jongsma; Marieke C G van der Hart; Laurence H Tecott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Anxiolytic profile of fluoxetine as monitored following repeated administration in animal rat model of chronic mild stress.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan; Darakshan Jabeen Haleem
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.330

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.