Literature DB >> 1350487

Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of carvedilol: a meta-analysis approach.

U Stienen1, W Meyer-Sabellek.   

Abstract

Establishing the overall efficacy or safety of a drug requires a unified methodological approach and analysis of all clinical trials to be included. As an example, this paper presents the aggregated dose-response relationship of efficacy data and a last-value analysis of laboratory data across all studies of the antihypertensive drug project carvedilol. Hemodynamic endpoints were calculated as change from the baseline blood pressure and pulse after an average treatment of 2-4 weeks whereas metabolic endpoints were calculated as changes from the baseline until the last day with respect to glucose, potassium, creatinine, lipids and liver function (median duration of treatment was 8-12 weeks). All antihypertensive trials were reanalyzed using an intent-to-treat principle. Aggregated efficacy data (mean, standard deviation, sample size) for each allocated group within each study were combined by means of meta-analysis separately for o.d. or b.i.d. dose regimens. Laboratory data were aggregated similarly within each study, using the last active drug as a grouping factor. The results showed that the patient population was treated adequately with 25 mg carvedilol o.d. The dose response curve for o.d. regimens shows a typical sigmoid shape: a steeper increase from 12.5 mg to 25 mg carvedilol, which then flattens (25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg carvedilol o.d.). No superiority of a b.i.d. dose regimen over a o.d. dose regimen by means of BP lowering could be detected. There was a considerable variation in the results between studies, much bigger than the dose-response effect, most due to monocentric trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1350487     DOI: 10.1007/bf00207614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Investig        ISSN: 0941-0198


  4 in total

1.  Considerations for the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Summary of a panel discussion.

Authors:  J P Boissel; J Blanchard; E Panak; J C Peyrieux; H Sacks
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-09

Review 2.  Antihypertensive profile of carvedilol.

Authors:  W Meyer-Sabellek; B Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1992

3.  Can intravenous beta blockade predict long-term haemodynamic benefit in chronic congestive heart failure secondary to ischaemic heart disease? A comparison between intravenous and oral carvedilol.

Authors:  P DasGupta; A Lahiri
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1992

4.  Efficacy of carvedilol in exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  J C Kaski; L Rodriguez-Plaza; J Brown; A Maseri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.105

  4 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Carvedilol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A P Lea; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Carvedilol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  D McTavish; D Campoli-Richards; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carvedilol.

Authors:  T Morgan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part II.

Authors:  R Kirsten; K Nelson; D Kirsten; B Heintz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.