Literature DB >> 1346171

Combined chemotherapy with ABCM versus melphalan for treatment of myelomatosis. The Medical Research Council Working Party for Leukaemia in Adults.

I C MacLennan1, C Chapman, J Dunn, K Kelly.   

Abstract

Both melphalan and cyclophosphamide increase life expectancy in patients with myelomatosis, but few large randomised studies have compared combination chemotherapy regimens with these single agents. In the Vth MRC myelomatosis trial, the survival of 314 patients randomised to receive ABCM (adriamycin, BCNU, cyclophosphamide, and melphalan) as first-line treatment was significantly longer than that of 316 patients given intermittent melphalan (M7) (p = 0.0003). The 75%, median, and 25% survivals were 7, 24, and 42 months, respectively, with M7 and 10, 32, and 56 months, respectively, with ABCM. Stable disease with few symptoms (plateau) was achieved by 61% of patients given ABCM and 49% of those given M7 (p = 0.004). Myelotoxicity was comparable between regimens. Cross-trial analysis suggests that M7 is comparable to melphalan and prednisone or melphalan, prednisone, and vincristine; that the efficacy of ABCM in the Vth trial and VIth MRC trials is comparable; and that ABCM gave better survival than intermittent melphalan regimens in the prognostic groups analysed. The results indicate that ABCM is an acceptable regimen that is more effective than melphalan, with or without prednisone, for first-line treatment of myelomatosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1346171     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90004-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  21 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of multiple myeloma in elderly patients. New developments.

Authors:  G J Ossenkoppele
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Do new therapeutic approaches (autotransplants, thalidomide, dexamethasone) improve the survival of patients with multiple myeloma followed in a rheumatology department?

Authors:  S El Mahou; M Attal; B Jamard; A Constantin; A Cantagrel; B Mazières; C Arnaud; M Laroche
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Multiple myeloma: current treatment.

Authors:  D Samson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  Therapeutic options in the treatment of multiple myeloma: pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations.

Authors:  F Wisløff; N Gulbrandsen; E Nord
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Oncology.

Authors:  J S Malpas
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  N H Russel; A E Hunter; A Haynes; E M Bessell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-25

Review 7.  Current drug therapy for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Y W Huang; A Hamilton; O J Arnuk; P Chaftari; R Chemaly
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Late relapse in IgD myeloma: value of immunohistochemistry in trephine biopsy specimens.

Authors:  P Kettle; T C Morris
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Identification and treatment of anaemia in older patients.

Authors:  P T Murphy; R M Hutchinson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  The treatment of multiple myeloma using vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP) alternating with high-dose cyclophosphamide and alpha(2)beta interferon versus VBMCP: results of a phase III Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E5A93.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Susanna Jacobus; William R Friedenberg; Coenraad Frederik Slabber; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.