Literature DB >> 1342013

Attentional load and visual neglect.

I Robertson1, R Frasca.   

Abstract

Ten subjects suffering from left unilateral neglect carried out a letter cancellation task under normal conditions, while counting forward, and when generating random numbers, respectively. The index of neglect increased with each of these conditions, though only the normal-random difference was statistically significant. In a second study, four left unilateral neglect subjects and four right brain-damaged controls carried out a simple reaction time task, with stimuli appearing randomly to the left and right, with and without the simultaneous performance of a secondary task (counting backward in threes from 100). The discrepancy between left versus right latencies increased significantly in the secondary task condition for two patients in the neglect group but not for the other two. None of the control group showed this effect. Theoretical implications of these findings for understanding neglect are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1342013     DOI: 10.3109/00207459108999756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neurosci        ISSN: 0020-7454            Impact factor:   2.292


  9 in total

1.  Spatial attention: more than intrinsic alerting?

Authors:  W Sturm; B Schmenk; B Fimm; K Specht; S Weis; A Thron; K Willmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Residual rightward attentional bias after apparent recovery from right hemisphere damage: implications for a multicomponent model of neglect.

Authors:  J B Mattingley; J L Bradshaw; J A Bradshaw; N C Nettleton
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Patterns of spontaneous recovery of neglect and associated disorders in acute right brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  A Farnè; L J Buxbaum; M Ferraro; F Frassinetti; J Whyte; T Veramonti; V Angeli; H B Coslett; E Làdavas
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Neglect and extinction depend greatly on task demands: a review.

Authors:  Mario Bonato
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Unilateral neglect post stroke: Eye movement frequencies indicate directional hypokinesia while fixation distributions suggest compensational mechanism.

Authors:  Kjersti M Walle; Jan E Nordvik; Frank Becker; Thomas Espeseth; Markus H Sneve; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect.

Authors:  Konstantinos Priftis; Mario Bonato; Marco Zorzi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Visual Scanning Training for Neglect after Stroke with and without a Computerized Lane Tracking Dual Task.

Authors:  M E van Kessel; A C H Geurts; W H Brouwer; L Fasotti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Computer-Based Assessment: Dual-Task Outperforms Large-Screen Cancellation Task in Detecting Contralesional Omissions.

Authors:  Sanna Villarreal; Matti Linnavuo; Raimo Sepponen; Outi Vuori; Mario Bonato; Hanna Jokinen; Marja Hietanen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-07

9.  Task-related modulation of visual neglect in cancellation tasks.

Authors:  Margarita Sarri; Richard Greenwood; Lalit Kalra; Jon Driver
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.139

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.