Literature DB >> 1340846

Psychosocial interventions in adult patients with coronary heart disease and cancer. A literature review.

D R Hill1, K Kelleher, S A Shumaker.   

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that chronic medical illness is associated with an increased prevalence and incidence of psychiatric and psychological disturbances. The present literature review is based on two theses: first, that chronic illness is viewed as a stressor and is associated with increased psychological distress, and secondly, that interventions can minimize the distress. A review of the studies conducted with adult patients diagnosed either with coronary heart disease or cancer suggests that psychosocial interventions are, in general, efficacious in relieving self-reported psychological distress. The review also recommends psychosocial interventions for high-risk patients rather than all patients, and that researchers need to identify other outcomes such as health care costs, disability, days in hospital, morbidity, and mortality in order to convince policy makers that these interventions are worthwhile. Recommendations for future research are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1340846     DOI: 10.1016/0163-8343(92)90116-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  5 in total

1.  Cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  J Dinnes; J Kleijnen; M Leitner; D Thompson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

Review 2.  Social support and prognosis following first myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H C Bucher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Psychodynamic psychotherapy for cancer patients.

Authors:  N Straker
Journal:  J Psychother Pract Res       Date:  1997

4.  On organizing an international workshop on psychotherapeutic interventions in cancer patients. A virtual coffeebreak communication.

Authors:  A Kiss
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or revascularisation: design and rationale of the Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM): a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN72884263].

Authors:  Kate Jolly; Gregory Y H Lip; Josie Sandercock; Sheila M Greenfield; James P Raftery; Jonathan Mant; Rod Taylor; Deirdre Lane; Kaeng Wai Lee; A J Stevens
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.