Literature DB >> 1337055

Evidence for de novo rearrangements of Drosophila transposable elements induced by the passage to the cell culture.

C Di Franco1, C Pisano, F Fourcade-Peronnet, G Echalier, N Junakovic.   

Abstract

The genomic distribution and the number of elements of eleven transposon families have been compared by the Southern technique between permanent cultured cells, larval salivary glands and the brains and whole flies of an inbred Drosophila line (inb-c) from which the cells were established. In cultured cells, changes in restriction patterns consistent with various types of rearrangements such as amplification, transposition and excision of the elements of copia, 1731, 412, 297 and mdg-4 transposon families are detected whereas B 104, G and blood elements appear stable. In previous reports these rearrangements were not detected among individuals of the inb-c line or among samples of somatic tissues, or in samples spanning years of maintenance of cultured cells. Hence, we believe that they have been induced de novo during the passage to the cell culture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1337055     DOI: 10.1007/bf00120994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  24 in total

1.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Molecular themes in oncogenesis.

Authors:  J M Bishop
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-01-25       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Structure and genomic organization of I elements involved in I-R hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Crozatier; C Vaury; I Busseau; A Pelisson; A Bucheton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Molecular genetics of transposable elements in plants.

Authors:  H P Döring; P Starlinger
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Reptitive DNA sequences in drosophila.

Authors:  J G Gall; E H Cohen; M L Polan
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Karyotype polymorphism in a cell population of Drosophila melanogaster cultured in vitro.

Authors:  S Dolfini
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  On the transposition of copia-like nomadic elements in cultured Drosophila cells.

Authors:  N Junakovic; C Di Franco; M Best-Belpomme; G Echalier
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Copia is transcriptionally responsive to environmental stress.

Authors:  D J Strand; J F McDonald
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Genomic and structural organization of Drosophila melanogaster G elements.

Authors:  P P Di Nocera; F Graziani; G Lavorgna
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-01-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Transposition of elements of the 412, copia and 297 dispersed repeated gene families in Drosophila.

Authors:  S S Potter; W J Brorein; P Dunsmuir; G M Rubin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  What makes transposable elements move in the Drosophila genome?

Authors:  M P García Guerreiro
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Host RNAs, including transposons, are encapsidated by a eukaryotic single-stranded RNA virus.

Authors:  Andrew Routh; Tatiana Domitrovic; John E Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Endogenous RNA interference provides a somatic defense against Drosophila transposons.

Authors:  Wei-Jen Chung; Katsutomo Okamura; Raquel Martin; Eric C Lai
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Rates of movement of transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Domínguez; J Albornoz
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1996-05-23

Review 5.  Genome and stresses: reactions against aggressions, behavior of transposable elements.

Authors:  C Arnault; I Dufournel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Ongoing transposition in cell culture reveals the phylogeny of diverse Drosophila S2 sublines.

Authors:  Shunhua Han; Guilherme B Dias; Preston J Basting; Michael G Nelson; Sanjai Patel; Mar Marzo; Casey M Bergman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Morphological and molecular characterization of new Drosophila cell lines established from a strain permissive for gypsy transposition.

Authors:  F Chalvet; A Debec; C Marcaillou; C Rougeau; A Bucheton
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.416

8.  Changes in chromatin structure correlate with transcriptional activity of nucleolar rDNA in polytene chromosomes.

Authors:  Maria Piedad Plata; Hyuck Joon Kang; Shaofei Zhang; Srilalitha Kuruganti; Shih-Jui Hsu; Mariano Labrador
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Retrotransposons are specified as DNA replication origins in the gene-poor regions of Arabidopsis heterochromatin.

Authors:  Zaida Vergara; Joana Sequeira-Mendes; Jordi Morata; Ramón Peiró; Elizabeth Hénaff; Celina Costas; Josep M Casacuberta; Crisanto Gutierrez
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Epigenomic consequences of immortalized plant cell suspension culture.

Authors:  Milos Tanurdzic; Matthew W Vaughn; Hongmei Jiang; Tae-Jin Lee; R Keith Slotkin; Bryon Sosinski; William F Thompson; R W Doerge; Robert A Martienssen
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 8.029

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.