Literature DB >> 1336629

Actions of three structurally distinct sea anemone toxins on crustacean and insect sodium channels.

V L Salgado1, W R Kem.   

Abstract

The membrane actions of three recently isolated polypeptide neurotoxins from the sea anemones Stichodactyla helianthus (toxin ShI), Condylactis gigantea (toxin CgII) and Calliactis parasitica (toxin CpI) were investigated on action potentials and voltage-clamp membrane currents of the giant axon of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. The first two toxins were also tested on the cockroach (Periplaneta americana) giant axon. All three toxins were particularly lethal to crustaceans, moderately toxic to an insect (cockroach), and essentially non-toxic to a mammal (mouse). ShI and CgII were 50- to 100-fold more potent on crayfish than on cockroach axons; this difference in activity was correlated with the relative reversibility of their effects on these arthropod axons. The crustacean selectivity of these toxins is therefore due largely to their greater affinity for crustacean sodium channels. All three toxins prolonged crayfish giant axon action potentials by selectively slowing Na channel inactivation without greatly affecting activation. Before toxin treatment, inactivation was nearly exponential, with a time constant less than 1 msec. After treatment, the inactivation time course could be described as the sum of two exponentially decaying components, plus a large steady-state component. The major component possessed the slower (10-20 msec) time constant. The steady-state component increased with depolarization, causing the sodium channel steady-state inactivation curve to reach a minimum between -60 and -20 mV and then increase at more positive potentials. All three toxins shifted the peak sodium current-voltage relation to the left. This voltage shift was greater at 20 degrees C than at 10 degrees C. Maintained membrane depolarization during toxin wash-in delayed the appearance of modified Na channels. Also, prolonged depolarization of toxin-treated axons converted modified sodium channels back to normal ones. The toxins did not affect potassium and leakage currents. Our results indicate that the three crustacean-active sea anemone toxins share a common electrophysiological action on arthropod sodium channels, at least at the macroscopic level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1336629     DOI: 10.1016/0041-0101(92)90512-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  6 in total

1.  New Sea Anemone Toxin RTX-VI Selectively Modulates Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels.

Authors:  R S Kalina; S Peigneur; I N Gladkikh; P S Dmitrenok; N Y Kim; E V Leychenko; M M Monastyrnaya; J Tytgat; E P Kozlovskaya
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 0.788

Review 2.  Site-3 toxins and cardiac sodium channels.

Authors:  Dorothy A Hanck; Michael F Sheets
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 3.  Sea anemone venom as a source of insecticidal peptides acting on voltage-gated Na+ channels.

Authors:  Frank Bosmans; Jan Tytgat
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 4.  Sea anemone toxins affecting voltage-gated sodium channels--molecular and evolutionary features.

Authors:  Yehu Moran; Dalia Gordon; Michael Gurevitz
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  CgNa, a type I toxin from the giant Caribbean sea anemone Condylactis gigantea shows structural similarities to both type I and II toxins, as well as distinctive structural and functional properties(1).

Authors:  Emilio Salceda; Javier Pérez-Castells; Blanca López-Méndez; Anoland Garateix; Hector Salazar; Omar López; Abel Aneiros; Ludger Ständker; Lászlo Béress; Wolf-Georg Forssmann; Enrique Soto; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero; Guillermo Giménez-Gallego
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 6.  The Anemonia viridis Venom: Coupling Biochemical Purification and RNA-Seq for Translational Research.

Authors:  Aldo Nicosia; Alexander Mikov; Matteo Cammarata; Paolo Colombo; Yaroslav Andreev; Sergey Kozlov; Angela Cuttitta
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.