Literature DB >> 133642

The sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: experience with and technical considerations for replacement of the early model.

S M Scott, G K Sethi, M W Flye, T Takaro.   

Abstract

Reoperation was performed in seven (16%) of 43 patients with early models of Magovern sutureless aortic valve prostheses, because of thromboembolism and ball variance. All patients survived reoperation with no major complications. Removal of the sutureless prosthesis was not difficult when an insertion tool of proper size was used. A scarred annulus remained which was favorable for the suturing of a new prosthesis. The incidence of disabling thromboembolism (42%) and poppet failure (21%) is high with these early models. When these complications occur, replacement of the prosthesis is recommended to prevent death or recurrent embolic episodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 133642      PMCID: PMC1344427          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-197608000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

1.  SUTURELESS AORTIC AND MITRAL PROSTHETIC VALVES. CLINICAL RESULTS AND OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE ON SIXTY PATIENTS.

Authors:  G J MAGOVERN; E M KENT; H W CROMIE; W B CUSHING; S SCOTT
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  AORTIC VALVE SURGERY USING THE MAGOVERN PROSTHESIS.

Authors:  S M SCOTT; R G FISH; T TAKARO; W H SEWELL
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Magovern-Cromie ball valve prosthesis for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  T P Roman; T T Schattenberg; H A Oxman; R B Wallace
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  The challenge of reoperation in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  S Londe; W L Sugg
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  A review of the effect of previous operations on the results of open-heart surgery.

Authors:  J D Wisheart; D N Ross; J K Ross
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Aortic ball variance. Diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  J C Hylen; F E Kloster; A Starr; H E Griswold
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Late results of valve replacement.

Authors:  J R Rees; B G Miscall; G R Holswade; A Castaneda; C W Lillehei
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Replacement of the aortic valve with the Starr-Edwards and sutureless (Magovern) prosthesis. Comparative recatherization results.

Authors:  R C Bonnabeau; E L Mantini; Y Wang; C W Lillehei
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.778

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Aortic valve replacement in geriatric patients with small aortic roots: are sutureless valves the future?

Authors:  Malakh Shrestha; Ilona Maeding; Klaus Höffler; Nurbol Koigeldiyev; Georg Marsch; Thierry Siemeni; Felix Fleissner; Axel Haverich
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-12

Review 2.  Perceval Sutureless Valve - are Sutureless Valves Here?

Authors:  Rahul Chandola; Kevin Teoh; Abdelsalam Elhenawy; George Christakis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015

3.  Early Clinical Results of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve in 139 Patients: Freeman Experience.

Authors:  Syed Saleem Mujtaba; Simon Ledingham; Asif Raza Shah; Stephen Clark; Thasee Pillay; Stephan Schueler
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

4.  Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.

Authors:  Syed Saleem Mujtaba; Simon M Ledingham; Asif Raza Shah; Thasee Pillay; Stephan Schueler; Stephen Clark
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.