Literature DB >> 13351623

On the mitotic movements of chromosomes.

J G CARLSON.   

Abstract

My conclusions, which, I confess, are tentative and based mainly on studies of one kind of cell, the grasshopper neuroblast, may be summarized as follows. The late prophase orientation of the chromosomes is a carry-over from the late telophase orientation. It is apparently maintained by means of the centromeres, which appear to be attached within a limited region of the nucleus throughout telophase, interphase, and prophase. Metaphase orientation of the chromosomes may be explained as the resultant of two forces: a force involving the centromere and spindle, which is responsible for keeping the centromeres in the equatorial plane of the spindle, and a repulsion force involving the noncentromeric portion of the chromosomes, which results in a tendency toward uniform spacing of the chromosomes outside the spindle. Anaphase separation of sister chromatids and their subsequent movement toward the poles of the spindle involves at least four distinct phases: (i) the initial poleward movement of the centromeres, which may be due to intrinsic repulsion or to a force acting between spindle and centromeres that produces an angle of almost 90 degrees between the separated and unseparated portions of the chromatids; (ii) the autonomous separation of the noncentromeric part of the chromosome; (iii) elongation of the spindle, beginning just after the sister chromatids are separated proximally and ending when the longer chromatids are about to lose contact distally; and (iv) the later movement apart of the daughter chromosomes, probably resulting from a pushing force exerted by elongation of the interzonal fibers.

Keywords:  CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOMES

Mesh:

Year:  1956        PMID: 13351623     DOI: 10.1126/science.124.3214.203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  7 in total

1.  Oogenesis in Mikiola fagi Hart. (Cecidomyiidae; Diptera).

Authors:  B MATUSZEWSKI
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1962       Impact factor: 4.316

2. 

Authors:  Paul Koch
Journal:  Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org       Date:  1964-09

3.  Increase induced by colchicine in the incidence of somatic crossing over in Glycine max.

Authors:  B K Vig
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  In situ analysis of normal and abnormal patterns of the mitotic apparatus in cultured rat-kangaroo cells.

Authors:  W K Heneen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Suppression of somatic crossing over in Glycine max (L.) merrill by deoxyribose cytidine.

Authors:  B K Vig
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1972

6.  Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing.

Authors:  G Sluder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  [On the function of the "Flemming body" during division of animal cells].

Authors:  N Paweletz
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1967-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.