Literature DB >> 1334820

Single vs. double data entry in CAST.

R A Reynolds-Haertle1, R McBride.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine whether, using microcomputer-based data entry, double data entry (DE) significantly lowers data entry keying error rates when compared to single entry (SE). Clinical centers of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) participated in a randomized crossover design experiment comparing SE and DE. A total of 42,278 data items (fields) were checked for consistency between the paper data form and the computer database. The overall error rate was 19 per 10,000 fields. Error rates were 22 and 15 per 10,000 fields for SE and DE, respectively; P = .09 by Poisson regression. DE took 37% longer than SE, costing each clinic approximately an extra 90 min per month.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1334820     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90205-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  13 in total

1.  Reducing errors from the electronic transcription of data collected on paper forms: a research data case study.

Authors:  Monika M Wahi; David V Parks; Robert C Skeate; Steven B Goldin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman; Howard Mann; Jesse A Berlin; Kay Dickersin; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Kenneth F Schulz; Wendy R Parulekar; Karmela Krleza-Jeric; Andreas Laupacis; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-08

3.  Growth in North American white children with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1).

Authors:  J Szudek; P Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Comparing the accuracy and speed of four data-checking methods.

Authors:  Kimberly A Barchard; Andrew J Freeman; Elizabeth Ochoa; Amber K Stephens
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

5.  The University of Texas Houston Stroke Registry (UTHSR): implementation of enhanced data quality assurance procedures improves data quality.

Authors:  Mohammad H Rahbar; Nicole R Gonzales; Manouchehr Ardjomand-Hessabi; Amirali Tahanan; Melvin R Sline; Hui Peng; Renganayaki Pandurengan; Farhaan S Vahidy; Jessica D Tanksley; Ayodeji A Delano; Rene M Malazarte; Ellie E Choi; Sean I Savitz; James C Grotta
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.474

6.  The Strathclyde Evaluation of Children's Active Travel (SE-CAT): study rationale and methods.

Authors:  David McMinn; David A Rowe; Shemane Murtagh; Norah M Nelson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Data management in clinical research: An overview.

Authors:  Binny Krishnankutty; Shantala Bellary; Naveen B R Kumar; Latha S Moodahadu
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.200

8.  An innovative database for epidemiological field studies of neglected tropical diseases.

Authors:  Darren J Gray; Simon J Forsyth; Robert S Li; Donald P McManus; Yuesheng Li; Honggen Chen; Feng Zheng; Gail M Williams
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2009-05-26

9.  Quantifying data quality for clinical trials using electronic data capture.

Authors:  Meredith L Nahm; Carl F Pieper; Maureen M Cunningham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Double-blind control of the data manager doesn't have any impact on data entry reliability and should be considered as an avoidable cost.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Vasiliki Karampoiki; Jacopo Mauri; Konstantinos Kamposioras; Georgios Alexiou; Georgios Ferentinos; Lamprini Tsali; Ioanna Karathanasi; Christina Peponi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.