Literature DB >> 1334819

Enrollment in clinical trials: institutional factors affecting enrollment in the cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST).

S Shea1, J T Bigger, J Campion, J L Fleiss, L M Rolnitzky, E Schron, L Gorkin, K Handshaw, M R Kinney, M Branyon.   

Abstract

Recruitment and Enrollment Assessment in Clinical Trials (REACT), an NHLBI-sponsored substudy of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), was conducted to assess factors associated with enrollment in clinical trials. We report on the relationships of institutional factors at CAST sites to patient enrollment. The proportion of CAST-eligible patients enrolling at each CAST site during the REACT study period was defined as the number of subjects enrolled divided by the sum of (1) the number enrolled plus (2) the number of eligibles who refused plus (3) the number of eligibles whose physicians refused to permit CAST personnel to attempt to enroll them. A questionnaire that included 78 questions regarding factors hypothesized to be associated with enrollment was completed between August 1988 and February 1990 by the nurse coordinators at all 112 CAST sites in the United States and Canada. Sixteen items were unanalyzable, and 37 of the remaining 62 were grouped into seven scales. The remaining items were analyzed individually. Enrollment proportions varied widely across the 112 CAST sites (mean 32.7% SD 22.6). Five variables or scales were included in the final multiple regression model (multiple R2 = .39). The most important of these was the proportion of eligible patients at a site cared for by medical staff other than private attending physicians (multiple R2 for this variable alone, .26). This proportion tended to be high in teaching hospitals. Other variables in this model that were associated with higher enrollment proportions included the number of days per week a nurse coordinator was present at the site, the number of nurse coordinator full-time equivalents at the site, fewer other clinical trials for which the nurse coordinator was responsible, and fewer perceived obstacles to enrollment. These findings indicate that enrollment was more successful at hospitals with higher proportions of eligible subjects cared for by fellows, housestaff, and service attending physicians and at institutions with the committed presence of a nurse-coordinator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1334819     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90204-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  7 in total

1.  The prevalence and economic impact of low-enrolling clinical studies at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Darlene R Kitterman; Steven K Cheng; David M Dilts; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Recruitment and retention of pregnant women into clinical research trials: an overview of challenges, facilitators, and best practices.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Diane S Saint-Victor; Margaret Brewinski Isaacs; Sonnie Kim; Geeta K Swamy; Jeanne S Sheffield; Kathryn M Edwards; Tonya Villafana; Ouda Kamagate; Kevin Ault
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  View of physicians on and barriers to patient enrollment in a multicenter clinical trial: experience in a Japanese rural area.

Authors:  Hiroaki Yanagawa; Masatoshi Kishuku; Masashi Akaike; Hiroyuki Azuma; Minoru Irahara
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-06-04

4.  Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches.

Authors:  Sayeeda Rahman; Md Anwarul Azim Majumder; Sami F Shaban; Nuzhat Rahman; Moslehuddin Ahmed; Khalid Bin Abdulrahman; Urban Ja D'Souza
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2011-03-07

5.  Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Snowdon; Diana R Elbourne; Jo Garcia; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; David Francis; Adrian M Grant; Rosemary C Knight; Alison M McDonald; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Determinants of patient recruitment in a multicenter clinical trials group: trends, seasonality and the effect of large studies.

Authors:  A B Haidich; J P Ioannidis
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2001-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Predicting enrollment performance of investigational centers in phase III multi-center clinical trials.

Authors:  Rutger M van den Bor; Diederick E Grobbee; Bas J Oosterman; Petrus W J Vaessen; Kit C B Roes
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-07-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.