Literature DB >> 1334445

Double-blind group comparative study of 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops with 2% sodium cromoglycate and placebo eye drops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

M Leino1, K Ennevaara, A L Latvala, P Nordgren, A M Posti, R Suves, E Takalo.   

Abstract

A 4 week, multicentre, double-blind, double dummy, placebo controlled group comparative study was carried out during the birch pollen season to compare the efficacy and tolerability of 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops (twice daily) and 2% sodium cromoglycate eye drops (four times daily). Participants with a history of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) were randomized to receive nedocromil sodium (60), sodium cromoglycate (61) or placebo (64). Clinical assessment of SAC showed improvement with both active treatments compared to placebo but symptomatology was low and only changes in photophobia and grittiness reached significance (P < 0.05). Patient diaries showed significant control of itching by both active treatments, compared to placebo, with no differences between the active preparations. Patients' opinions indicated a marked placebo effect: 73% of this group reported full or moderate control of symptoms, compared with 75% in sodium cromoglycate and 80% in the nedocromil sodium group. Unusual symptoms were most common (27 patients) with nedocromil sodium eye drops: P < 0.05 vs. placebo (15 patients). There were no serious adverse events. Nedocromil sodium eye drops (b.d.) and sodium cromoglycate eye drops (q.i.d.) were both considered clinically more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms of SAC due to birch pollen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1334445     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb02066.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  8 in total

1.  Double-masked, randomized, parallel-group study comparing olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution with cromolyn sodium 2% and levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic preparations in children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Giorgio Ciprandi; Darell Turner; Robert D Gross
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2004-03

Review 2.  Allergic eye disease mechanisms.

Authors:  J I McGill; S T Holgate; M K Church; D F Anderson; A Bacon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Efficacy of nedocromil 2% versus fluorometholone 0.1%: a randomised, double masked trial comparing the effects on severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  K F Tabbara; S A al-Kharashi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 4.  Therapeutic options in ocular allergic disease.

Authors:  M Hingorani; S Lightman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A double blind placebo controlled group comparative study of ophthalmic sodium cromoglycate and nedocromil sodium in the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Authors:  M el Hennawi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  N-acetyl-aspartyl glutamic acid (NAAGA) topical eyedrops in the treatment of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC).

Authors:  F Meijer; K Pogany; J H Kok; A Kijlstra
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Topical treatments for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and effectiveness.

Authors:  Christopher G Owen; Anupa Shah; Katherine Henshaw; Liam Smeeth; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis: a review of the role of topical levocabastine.

Authors:  R G Wijk
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.