Literature DB >> 1330533

Glycaemic index of foods.

A S Truswell1.   

Abstract

From the mid-1970s several groups realized progressively that the same amounts of carbohydrates in different foods produce quite different blood glucose curves after ingestion. The glycaemic index (GI) was introduced by Jenkins to express the rise of blood glucose after eating a food against a standard blood glucose curve after glucose (or white bread) in the same subject. The GI ranges from about 20 for fructose and whole barley to about 100 for glucose and baked potato. A table is given of representative GI values. There appears to be no general correlation between GI and per cent resistant starch in foods. Questions about methodology for GI are discussed and the factors in food that affect glycaemic response are briefly reviewed. The GI is affected by the physical form of a food, by processing and by associated fat in the food, which reduces the GI, presumably by delayed gastric emptying. As a rule the degree of insulin response to carbohydrate-containing foods is similar to the glycaemic response. Most investigators have found that the GI of a meal of mixed foods can be predicted from the (weighted) GI of its constituent foods. The GI concept is proving useful in dietary design for the management of diabetes mellitus, especially the non-insulin-dependent type. It may prove useful for prevention of diabetes and perhaps also in pre-event meals for athletes, as a factor in dental cariogenesis, in determining satiety, and conceivably regular low GI foods could delay ageing by reducing glycosylation of body proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1330533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  Digestion of starch in a dynamic small intestinal model.

Authors:  M R Jaime-Fonseca; O Gouseti; P J Fryer; M S J Wickham; S Bakalis
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 2.  Fructose and Fructans: Opposite Effects on Health?

Authors:  Francesca Di Bartolomeo; Wim Van den Ende
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Composition, digestibility and application in breadmaking of banana flour.

Authors:  E Juarez-Garcia; E Agama-Acevedo; S G Sáyago-Ayerdi; S L Rodríguez-Ambriz; L A Bello-Pérez
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 4.  Nutrition, hormones, and breast cancer: is insulin the missing link?

Authors:  R Kaaks
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  A case study of type 2 diabetes self-management.

Authors:  Hsin-i Wu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Fructose, insulin resistance, and metabolic dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Heather Basciano; Lisa Federico; Khosrow Adeli
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  Phase 1 Study of the Pharmacology of BTI320 Before High-Glycemic Meals.

Authors:  David R Luke; Karen Ka Yan Lee; Carl W Rausch; Camille Cheng
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2018-06-05

8.  Effect of fructose or sucrose feeding with different levels on oral glucose tolerance test in normal and type 2 diabetic rats.

Authors:  Sanghee Kwon; You Jin Kim; Mi Kyung Kim
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 1.926

9.  Effect of High β-glucan Barley on Postprandial Blood Glucose and Insulin Levels in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Yukie Fuse; Mariko Higa; Naoko Miyashita; Asami Fujitani; Kaoru Yamashita; Takamasa Ichijo; Seiichiro Aoe; Takahisa Hirose
Journal:  Clin Nutr Res       Date:  2020-01-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.