BACKGROUND: Based on the previous finding that cell killing effects of cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents depend on the concentration-time product (C x T) or the area under the curve (AUC), the authors investigated in vitro cytotoxic effects of nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU) and mitomycin C (MMC) under an experimental condition in which the assay AUC was equivalent to their clinically achievable AUC. METHODS: The cytotoxic effects of these agents on human cancer cell lines, consisting of 9 small cell lung carcinomas (SCLC) and 10 gastric cancers, were measured by a tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT assay). RESULTS: These cell lines individually responded to ACNU and MMC in this assay condition. When the authors considered 60% or greater cell kill to be effective, the in vitro response rates of SCLC to ACNU and MMC were 22% (two of nine carcinomas) and 67% (six of nine carcinomas), respectively. The response rates of gastric cancer to ACNU and MMC were 10% (1 of 10 carcinomas) and 40% (4 of 10 carcinomas), respectively. Except for the response of SCLC to ACNU, these in vitro response rates corresponded well to the clinical rates (SCLC to ACNU and MMC, 47% [14 of 30 carcinomas] and 50% [17 of 34 carcinomas], respectively; gastric cancer to ACNU and MMC, 11% [4 of 37 carcinomas] and 30% [63 of 211 carcinomas], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the introduction of the clinically equivalent AUC to the in vitro chemosensitivity test for cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents may improve its clinical predictability.
BACKGROUND: Based on the previous finding that cell killing effects of cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents depend on the concentration-time product (C x T) or the area under the curve (AUC), the authors investigated in vitro cytotoxic effects of nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU) and mitomycin C (MMC) under an experimental condition in which the assay AUC was equivalent to their clinically achievable AUC. METHODS: The cytotoxic effects of these agents on humancancer cell lines, consisting of 9 small cell lung carcinomas (SCLC) and 10 gastric cancers, were measured by a tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT assay). RESULTS: These cell lines individually responded to ACNU and MMC in this assay condition. When the authors considered 60% or greater cell kill to be effective, the in vitro response rates of SCLC to ACNU and MMC were 22% (two of nine carcinomas) and 67% (six of nine carcinomas), respectively. The response rates of gastric cancer to ACNU and MMC were 10% (1 of 10 carcinomas) and 40% (4 of 10 carcinomas), respectively. Except for the response of SCLC to ACNU, these in vitro response rates corresponded well to the clinical rates (SCLC to ACNU and MMC, 47% [14 of 30 carcinomas] and 50% [17 of 34 carcinomas], respectively; gastric cancer to ACNU and MMC, 11% [4 of 37 carcinomas] and 30% [63 of 211 carcinomas], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the introduction of the clinically equivalent AUC to the in vitro chemosensitivity test for cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents may improve its clinical predictability.