Literature DB >> 1329244

The W ileal reservoir: long-term assessment after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis.

B A Harms1, A B Andersen, J R Starling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report examines the viability of the W reservoir as a reliable option for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis and studies W reservoir adaptation as reflected by changes in compliance and stool frequency.
METHODS: Since 1984, 109 patients have undergone proctocolectomy with W reservoir reconstruction. Ileal reservoir static compliance was measured in 70 and 57 patients at 2 and 12 months after ileostomy takedown and in 25 patients at 3 years. Compliance was calculated as the change in volume over change in pressure.
RESULTS: Twenty-four-hour stool frequency decreased from 7.3 +/- 0.2 at 2 months to 4.9 +/- 0.2 at 1 year for patients with ulcerative colitis and from 6.3 +/- 0.4 to 3.4 +/- 0.4 for patients with familial polyposis (p less than or equal to 0.05). Compliance increased from 12.7 +/- 0.6 ml/mm Hg to 14.3 +/- 0.6 ml/mm Hg between 2 months and 1 year. No significant increase in compliance occurred after 1 year. Ninety-six percent of patients were continent during the day at 12 months although 10% experienced occasional minor leakage at night. Average postoperative morbidity (for example, small-bowel obstruction, anastomotic complications) was 35%. No operative deaths, pelvic sepsis, or reservoir loss occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that W ileal reservoirs (1) are an excellent option for ileal reservoir reconstruction, (2) have optimal functional and compliance properties versus lower capacity designs and straight ileoanal pull-through procedures, and (3) maintain stable compliance characteristics and functional reservoir volume after the initial year of adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1329244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  7 in total

1.  Key factors influencing bowel function after ileal W-pouch anal anastomosis: a spectral analysis of W-pouch motor activity.

Authors:  T Maruta; S Homma; M Yagi; J Hasegawa; K Shimamura; T Suda; Y Sakai; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of the functional results of ileorectostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis following total colectomy.

Authors:  A Nagy
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  G I Andriesse; H G Gooszen; M E Schipper; L M Akkermans; T J van Vroonhoven; C J van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Long-term results of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  K Mikkola; P Luukkonen; H J Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-rectal muscle sheath anastomosis for the treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Lian-Jie Liu; Xiao-Hui Shi; Xiao-Dong Xu; Hai-Feng Gong; Chuan-Gang Fu; Hao Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  S H Emile; S M Khan; E Silva-Alvarenga; Z Garoufalia; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.699

7.  Long-term followup with evaluation of the surgical and functional results of the ileal pouch reservoir in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Ola Røkke; Knut Iversen; Torill Olsen; Sølvi-Mai Ristesund; Geir Egil Eide; Gitta Erika Turowski
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.