Literature DB >> 13270077

The use and results of diphtheria immunization.

L GREENBERG.   

Abstract

After a brief historical review of the events leading to the development of diphtheria prophylactics, the author discusses the effect of immunization on diphtheria epidemiology and the principles governing the choice of prophylactics. For immunization campaigns to be really effective a high proportion of the population must be immunized, and the pre-school age-groups must be included. Indeed, there is evidence that primary immunization should not be delayed beyond the third or fourth month of life. The prophylactic used should be antigenically highly potent and should confer long-lasting immunity with three injections at the most.The author then considers the use of combined immunization, which is approached with caution in some countries but is generally accepted in North America, and goes on to discuss the immunization of adults. The fact that adults may have severe reactions to parenterally administered diphtheria toxoid has led to attempts to develop reaction-free prophylactics. Toxoid administered orally appears not to cause reactions but is not yet so effective as parenteral toxoid.

Keywords:  DIPHTHERIA/prevention and control; VACCINES AND VACCINATION

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1955        PMID: 13270077      PMCID: PMC2538015     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  13 in total

1.  Restoration of Diphtheria Immunity without Injections.

Authors:  G Bousfield
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1945-06-16

2.  The present status of immunization against diphtheria.

Authors:  D T FRASER
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1948-05

3.  The use of combined antigens in the immunization of infants.

Authors:  D S FLEMING; L GREENBERG; E M BEITH
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1948-08       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The effect of inherited antibodies on the active immunization of infants. Part II. Duration of immunity.

Authors:  L GREENBERG; D S FLEMING
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1951-12       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Natural non-specific synergists and antagonists in crude diphtheria toxid.

Authors:  D C LAHIRI
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1951-04       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  On the relation between toxin production and protein synthesis by Corynebacterium diphtheriae and the iron content of the culture medium.

Authors:  A TASMAN; J D VAN RAMSHORST
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1951       Impact factor: 2.271

7.  Alkali-dissolved diphtheria toxoid-antitoxin floccules adsorbed on aluminium carriers; immunization of adults.

Authors:  J H MASON
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1951-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Diphtheria immunization in young babies; a study of some factors involved.

Authors:  M BARR; A T GLENNY; K J RANDALL
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1950-01-07       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The effect of inherited antibodies on the active immunization of infants.

Authors:  L GREENBERG; D S FLEMING
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1950-02       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  The use of combined antigens in the immunization of infants.

Authors:  D S FLEMING; L GREENBERG
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1950-02       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Benefits and risks of childhood immunisations in developing countries.

Authors:  J D Holden
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.