Literature DB >> 1324557

Comparative contraceptive efficacy and mechanism of action of the norgestimate-containing triphasic oral contraceptive.

R S London1, A Chapdelaine, D Upmalis, W Olson, J Smith.   

Abstract

Norgestimate (NGM), a derivative of 19-nortestosterone with very specific affinity for the progesterone receptor, has been used in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE) at low doses in both monophasic and triphasic oral contraceptives (OCs). An open-label comparative clinical trial was conducted with 4,234 healthy women using comparative clinical trial was conducted with 4,234 healthy women using triphasic levonorgestrel (LUG)/EE and NGM/EE through a total of 22,312 menstrual cycles. Contraceptive (LUG)/EE and NGM/EE through a total of 22,312 menstrual cycles. Contraceptive efficacy was excellent with both preparations, with no statistically significant between-regimen differences in pregnancy rates. The theoretical Pearl index was the NGM/EE triphasic, and 0.34 for the LNG/EE triphasic. Adverse experiences in groups were typical of those that may occur among women taking low-dose OC agents. was similar with the two preparations: 8.6% for the NGM/EE triphasic and 6.8% for the LNG/EE triphasic. In a separate mechanism of action study, specific endocrine parameters were investigated in 20 subjects using the NGM/EE triphasic for 4 cycles. Ovulation suppression was demonstrated in statistically significant decreases from pretreatment values in serum levels of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, progesterone, and estradiol. Significant on-treatment increases in serum levels of sex hormone binding globulin evidenced minimal androgenicity. All hormonal values returned to or toward normal in the post-treatment cycle. The study results support those obtained in large noncomparative studies of the NGM/EE triphasic. This phased-dose combination suppresses ovulation and is a very effective, minimally androgenic contraceptive agent with a good safety profile.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Carbohydrate Metabolic Effects; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Estrogen; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Mode Of Action; Data Analysis; Endocrine Effects; Endocrine System; Estradiol--analysis; Estrogens; Ethinyl Estradiol; Family Planning; Follicle Stimulating Hormone--analysis; Gonadotropins; Gonadotropins, Pituitary; Hormones; Lipid Metabolic Effects; Lipids; Luteinizing Hormone--analysis; Metabolic Effects; Norgestimate; Oral Contraceptives, Combined--side effects; Oral Contraceptives, Phasic--side effects; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Ovulation Suppression; Physiology; Progestational Hormones; Progesterone--analysis; Research Methodology; Studies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1324557     DOI: 10.3109/00016349209156509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8835


  3 in total

Review 1.  Benefits and risks of third-generation oral contraceptives.

Authors:  E S Leblanc; A Laws
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Four decades of research on hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Diana B Petitti; Stephen Sidney
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Ovarian follicular development during the use of oral contraception: a review.

Authors:  Angela R Baerwald; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2004-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.