Literature DB >> 1320913

A comparison of granisetron as a single agent with conventional combination antiemetic therapies in the treatment of cytostatic-induced emesis. The Granisetron Study Group.

M Marty1.   

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of intravenous granisetron were compared with combinations of conventional antiemetics in two single-blind, parallel-group studies which have been reported previously. In this review updated data from both studies is presented. In both studies granisetron (40 micrograms/kg) was given as a single 5-min infusion before chemotherapy with two additional doses allowed to control subsequent nausea and vomiting. All patients were naive to chemotherapy. Patients due to receive cisplatin (greater than 49 mg/m2) were randomly assigned to receive either granisetron alone or metoclopramide (3 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (12 mg) given prophylactically followed by an 8-h infusion of metoclopramide (4 mg/kg). In the 24 h after the start of chemotherapy 70% of granisetron-treated patients and 67% of comparator group were complete responders. In patients due to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, granisetron was compared with chlorpromazine (up to 200 mg/24 h) plus dexamethasone (12 mg). Twenty-four hour efficacy was significantly higher in the granisetron group with complete response in 68% of patients compared to 47% in the comparator group (P less than 0.001). A subset of 40 patients in this study were crossed over to receive the alternative antiemetic on their next cycle of chemotherapy. A significant majority of patients (32/34; 94%) preferred granisetron (P less than 0.001). Around 80% of the granisetron-treated patients in both groups required only a single prophylactic dose of granisetron. Following the first additional dose of granisetron, around 87% of patients reported symptoms to be improved or resolved. Adverse experience reporting was higher in the comparator groups with somnolence and extrapyramidal reactions representing the most common events. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse experience in granisetron-treated patients. Granisetron has proved safe and effective in controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis and is more convenient to administer than conventional antiemetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1320913     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90630-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

Review 1.  Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.

Authors:  L A Sanchez; M Holdsworth; S B Bartel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Granisetron. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  G L Plosker; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The pharmacokinetics of granisetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

Authors:  A Allen; P Crome; C C Davie; M Davy; R W Jones; D M Pierce; J Upward; P Wijayawardhana
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Possible cardiac side effects of granisetron, an antiemetic agent, in patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcomas receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  H Watanabe; A Hasegawa; T Shinozaki; S Arita; M Chigira
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Granisetron (Kytril): a survey of use in clinical practice in Switzerland.

Authors:  J P Terrey; P A Casey
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Granisetron. An update of its therapeutic use in nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  Y E Yarker; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Comparison of granisetron alone and granisetron plus dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of cytotoxic-induced emesis.

Authors:  J Carmichael; E M Bessell; A L Harris; A W Hutcheon; P J Dawes; S Daniels; E M Bessel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.