Literature DB >> 131855

The arthritic complaint in primary care: prevalence, related disability, and costs.

W O Spitzer, M Harth, C H Goldsmith, G R Norman, G L Dickie, M J Bass, J P Newell.   

Abstract

Surveys conducted in five areas of Southern Ontario obtained clinical and service utilization data from 5,478 adults over 25 years of age. The two week period prevalence rates of arthritic and rheumatic (AR) complaints were 1.72 per cent and 2.14 per cent among two groups of users of primary care. In free-living general populations, the rates ranged from 6.23 per cent to 8.84 per cent. It was shown that only 25 per cent of complainants with AR symptoms sought health services. Of all adults seen by family physicians in one year, 28 per cent presented at least once with an AR complaint. While 20 per cent of all respondents reported some physical impairment, 43 per cent of those with AR complaints had impairment. The excess impairment was two per cent. Complaints with AR symptoms used health services at costs 78 per cent higher than the average expenditures in the same communities. The essential role of the primary care practitioner in the identification and control of AR disorders is strongly supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 131855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  11 in total

1.  The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Health education in rheumatology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Undergraduate education.

Authors:  P W Thompson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Management of common musculoskeletal problems: a survey of Ontario primary care physicians.

Authors:  R H Glazier; D M Dalby; E M Badley; G A Hawker; M J Bell; R Buchbinder; S C Lineker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-04-21       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Is there a need to educate family practitioners in rheumatology?

Authors:  G P Balint; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Rheumatic disease, the family physician, and the consultants: when to hold them and when to fold them.

Authors:  B Koehler; G Warren
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Relating undergraduate musculoskeletal medicine curricula to the needs of modern practice.

Authors:  K J Mulhall; E Masterson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Towards rationalisation of health-care delivery to rheumatic sufferers.

Authors:  W W Buchanan; W F Kean
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  Training and clinical competency in musculoskeletal medicine. Identifying the problem.

Authors:  N Craton; G O Matheson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Use of primary health services in sparsely populated country districts by patients with musculoskeletal symptoms: consultations with a physician.

Authors:  K E Rekola; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; J Takala
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.