Literature DB >> 1316829

A method of assigning scores to the components of a composite outcome: an example from the MITI trial.

A P Hallstrom1, P E Litwin, W D Weaver.   

Abstract

After obtaining expert opinion to assign weights to the individual components of a composite outcome, scores are assigned in such a way as to reflect these weights as well as to optimize the power for specified alternatives.

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1316829     DOI： 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90020-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN： 0197-2456


  8 in total

Review 1.  Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Ignacio Ferreira-González; Jason W Busse; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Victor M Montori; Elie A Akl; Dianne M Bryant; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Jordi Alonso; Andrew Worster; Suneel Upadhye; Roman Jaeschke; Holger J Schünemann; Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda; Valeria Pacheco-Huergo; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Ping Wu; Edward J Mills; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-04-02

2.  An optimal Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test of mortality and a continuous outcome.

Authors:  Roland A Matsouaka; Aneesh B Singhal; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Weighting components of composite end points in clinical trials: an approach using disability-adjusted life-years.

Authors:  Keun-Sik Hong; Latisha K Ali; Scott L Selco; Gregg C Fonarow; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Testing for heterogeneity among the components of a binary composite outcome in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Janice Pogue; Lehana Thabane; P J Devereaux; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.

Authors:  Joshua M Stolker; John A Spertus; David J Cohen; Philip G Jones; Kaushik K Jain; Emily Bamberger; Brady B Lonergan; Paul S Chan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Using a Composite Maternal-Infant Outcome Measure in Tuberculosis-Prevention Studies Among Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Grace Montepiedra; Soyeon Kim; Adriana Weinberg; Gerhard Theron; Timothy R Sterling; Sylvia M LaCourse; Sarah Bradford; Nahida Chakhtoura; Patrick Jean-Philippe; Scott Evans; Amita Gupta
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  A framework for considering the risk-benefit trade-off in designing noninferiority trials using composite outcome approaches.

Authors:  Grace Montepiedra; Ritesh Ramchandani; Sachiko Miyahara; Soyeon Kim
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Totality of outcomes: A different paradigm in assessing interventions for treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Grace Montepiedra; Courtney M Yuen; Michael L Rich; Scott R Evans
Journal:  J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis       Date:  2016-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.