Literature DB >> 1316139

Chromosomal heterogeneity of various Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae field strains.

J Frey1, A Haldimann, J Nicolet.   

Abstract

Restriction enzyme digestion and field inversion gel electrophoresis were used to analyze the chromosomes of strains of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and the related organism Mycoplasma flocculare. The chromosome size for the M. hyopneumoniae type strain was calculated from individual fragments to be 1,011.3 +/- 32.9 kbp. The chromosomes of M. hyopneumoniae field strains were approximately the same size. The restriction patterns obtained for the chromosomes of phenotypically similar M. hyopneumoniae strains were quite different. Therefore, the species M. hyopneumoniae seems to be very heterogeneous. A field inversion gel electrophoresis analysis of the entire chromosomes allowed us to distinguish M. hyopneumoniae strains easily and hence to characterize further the species M. hyopneumoniae. The chromosome size for M. flocculare was calculated to be 988.3 +/- 39.5 kbp. Restriction enzyme XhoI, which statistically should cut the M. hyopneumoniae chromosome frequently, did not cut the DNA of any of the M. hyopneumoniae strains but did digest M. flocculare DNA, indicating that there is a site-specific modification at CTCGAG which probably belongs to a restriction modification system in M. hyopneumoniae and is absent in M. flocculare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1316139     DOI: 10.1099/00207713-42-2-275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol        ISSN: 0020-7713


  7 in total

1.  Protein and antigenic variability among Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strains by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot.

Authors:  P Assunção; C De la Fe; A S Ramírez; O González Llamazares; J B Poveda
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis is a suitable tool for differentiation of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strains without cultivation.

Authors:  K Vranckx; D Maes; D Calus; I Villarreal; F Pasmans; F Haesebrouck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Amplified-fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting of Mycoplasma species.

Authors:  B Kokotovic; N F Friis; J S Jensen; P Ahrens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas.

Authors:  S Razin; D Yogev; Y Naot
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Comparison of Mycoplasma arthritidis strains by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoblotting, and DNA restriction analysis.

Authors:  L R Washburn; L L Voelker; L J Ehle; S Hirsch; C Dutenhofer; K Olson; B Beck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Determinants for swine mycoplasmal pneumonia reproduction under experimental conditions: A systematic review and recursive partitioning analysis.

Authors:  Beatriz Garcia-Morante; Joaquim Segalés; Emmanuel Serrano; Marina Sibila
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Current perspectives on the diagnosis and epidemiology of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection.

Authors:  Marina Sibila; Maria Pieters; Thomas Molitor; Dominiek Maes; Freddy Haesebrouck; Joaquim Segalés
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.688

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.