Literature DB >> 1314904

Internal motional averaging and three-dimensional structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance.

C B Post1.   

Abstract

Dynamic averaging effects from internal motions on interproton distances estimated from nuclear Overhauser effects (NOE) are determined by using a molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme. Generalized order parameters measuring angular averaging and radial averaging parameters are calculated. The product of these two parameters describes the full averaging effects on cross-relaxation. Analysis of 2778 non-methyl NOE interactions from the protein interior and surface indicates that distances estimated by assuming a rigid molecule have less than 10% error for 89% of the NOE interactions. However, analysis of 1854 methyl interactions found that only 68% of the distances estimated from cross-relaxation rates would have less than 10% error. Qualitative evaluation of distances according to strong, medium and weak NOE intensities, when used to define only the upper bound for interproton separation, would misassign less than 1% of the distance constraints because of motional averaging. Internal motions do not obscure the identification of secondary structure, although some instances of significant averaging effects were found for interactions in alpha-helical regions. Interresidue NOEs for amino acids more than three residues apart in the primary sequence are more extensively averaged than intraresidue or short-range interresidue NOEs. Intraresidue interactions exhibit a greater degree of angular averaging than those involving interresidue proton pairs. An internal motion does not equally affect all NOE interactions for a particular proton. Thus, incorporation of averaging parameters in nuclear magnetic resonance structure determination procedures must be made on a proton-pair-wise basis. On the basis of the motional averaging results, particular fixed-distance proton pairs in proteins are suggested for use as distance references. A small percentage of NOE pairs localized to three regions of the protein exhibit extreme averaging effects from internal motions. The regions and types of motions involved are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1314904     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90471-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  9 in total

1.  Intermolecular relaxation has little effect on intra-peptide exchange-transferred NOE intensities.

Authors:  Adam P R Zabell; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  A comparison of methods for calculating NMR cross-relaxation rates (NOESY and ROESY intensities) in small peptides.

Authors:  K Anton Feenstra; Christine Peter; Ruud M Scheek; Wilfred F van Gunsteren; Alan E Mark
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Protein proton-proton dynamics from amide proton spin flip rates.

Authors:  Daniel S Weaver; Erik R P Zuiderweg
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Molecular flexibility demonstrated by paramagnetic enhancements of nuclear relaxation. Application to alamethicin: a voltage-gated peptide channel.

Authors:  C L North; J C Franklin; R G Bryant; D S Cafiso
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Solution structure of a Lewis(x) analogue by off-resonance 1H NMR spectroscopy without use of an internal distance reference.

Authors:  P Berthault; N Birlirakis; G Rubinstenn; P Sinaÿ; H Desvaux
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Accuracy of bound peptide structures determined by exchange transferred nuclear Overhauser data: a simulation study.

Authors:  E Z Eisenmesser; A P Zabell; C B Post
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Assessment of protein solution versus crystal structure determination using spin-diffusion-suppressed NOE and heteronuclear relaxation data.

Authors:  D M LeMaster
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Reducing the measurement time of exact NOEs by non-uniform sampling.

Authors:  Parker J Nichols; Alexandra Born; Morkos A Henen; Dean Strotz; David N Jones; Frank Delaglio; Beat Vögeli
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Similarity measures for protein ensembles.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.