Literature DB >> 1313733

Peripheral and central delays in the cortical projections from human truncal muscles. Rapid central transmission of proprioceptive input from the hand but not the trunk.

G Macefield1, S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

In contrast to the cortical connections to and from the muscles of the hand, the transmission of an afferent volley from the intercostal muscles to the cerebral cortex takes approximately 10 ms longer than it takes a cortical motor volley to reach the muscle. This disparity in afferent and efferent cortical transmission times could be due to a slower peripheral conduction velocity of intercostal muscle afferents or a slower afferent conduction within the central nervous system. The present study derived peripheral and central conduction times for the truncal muscles from the onsets of the mechanically evoked intercostal and abdominal spinal reflexes and the onsets of the cortical sensory potentials. Mean latencies of the ipsilateral intercostal and abdominal reflexes (evoked and recorded in the mid-clavicular line) were 11.9 +/- 0.7 (SEM) ms and 13.7 +/- 0.9 ms, respectively; calculated peripheral conduction velocities were 69.4 +/- 4.1 m/s and 56.2 +/- 2.3 m/s (assuming equal velocities for the sensory and motor axons and an intraspinal delay of 1 ms). Central sensory conduction time (spinal cord to cortex) was calculated by subtracting the peripheral conduction times for the intercostal and abdominal afferents (5.5 +/- 0.3 ms and 6.4 +/- 0.4 ms) from the onsets of the cortical sensory potentials (19.4 +/- 0.8 ms and 25.3 +/- 12.3 ms); central sensory conduction times (14.2 +/- 1.7 ms and 18.6 +/- 2.3 ms) were 8-11 ms longer than central motor conduction times. These results demonstrate that peripheral conduction velocities of intercostal and abdominal afferents are not slow, and that, when compared with the extremities, there is a relatively long central conduction time for proprioceptive information from the trunk to the cerebral cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1313733     DOI: 10.1093/brain/115.1.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  6 in total

1.  External perturbation of the trunk in standing humans differentially activates components of the medial back muscles.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Paul W Hodges; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Critical delay for overshooting in planned arm movements with delayed feedback.

Authors:  Dan Beamish; Christopher Peskun; Jianhong Wu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Fifty years later: A neurodynamic explanation of Fitts' law.

Authors:  Dan Beamish; Shabana Ali Bhatti; I Scott MacKenzie; Jianhong Wu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The simple frequency response of human stretch reflexes in which either short- or long-latency components predominate.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Role of airway receptors in the reflex responses of human inspiratory muscles to airway occlusion.

Authors:  J E Butler; D K McKenzie; M R Crawford; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Event-related potentials following contraction of respiratory muscles in pre-term and full-term infants.

Authors:  Kimberley Whitehead; Laura Jones; Maria Pureza Laudiano-Dray; Judith Meek; Lorenzo Fabrizi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.