Literature DB >> 13129666

The effects of oral and intramuscular administration and dose escalation of enrofloxacin on the selection of quinolone resistance among Salmonella and coliforms in pigs.

C Wiuff1, J Lykkesfeldt, O Svendsen, F M Aarestrup.   

Abstract

The effect of route of administration and dose of enrofloxacin (Baytril) on the development of fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella and Escherichia coli in the intestinal tract of pigs was investigated. Healthy pigs at the age of 8-10 weeks were infected with a mixture of susceptible wild-type (MICciprofloxacin = 0.03 microg/ml) and a mutant Salmonella typhimurium with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (MICciprofloxacin = 0.5 microg/ml) (in the ratio 99:1) and treated with 2.5 mg/kg bwt enrofloxacin by either intramuscular (i.m.) or oral (p.o.) administration at time points either 4 or 24 h after the infection. The treatment via the intramuscular route of administration (24 h after the infection) was carried out with elevated doses of 7.5 and 15 mg/kg bwt as well. Emergence of resistance during a 3-day treatment period and persistence up to 13 days after treatment, was monitored by counting the resistant and total number of coliforms and Salmonella in faeces of the pigs. High frequencies of fluoroquinolone resistance developed rapidly among the coliform flora independent of route of administration, dose or time of initiation of the treatment. Selection for resistance among the artificially introduced Salmonella was reduced by using the intramuscular route and by escalating the dose 3 or 6 times the recommended dose of 2.5 mg/kg bwt, which also resulted in shortening of the period, in which the pigs were shedding Salmonella. The resistance among the coliform flora persisted for at least 2 weeks. The Salmonella infection was cleared in all cases during the 2 weeks independent of frequency of resistance. The study showed that resistance is very easily selected by treatment with enrofloxacin at the recommended dose 2.5 mg/kg bwt, but also that the intensity of selection can be reduced by using intramuscular dosing (instead of oral dosing) and by escalating that i.m. dose. The results obtained with Salmonella also showed that even very small changes in the active drug concentrations might completely change the intensity of selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13129666     DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(03)00112-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  25 in total

1.  Correlation between fecal concentrations of ciprofloxacin and fecal counts of resistant Enterobacteriaceae in piglets treated with ciprofloxacin: toward new means to control the spread of resistance?

Authors:  Thu Thuy Nguyen; Elisabeth Chachaty; Clarisse Huy; Carole Cambier; Jean de Gunzburg; France Mentré; Antoine Andremont
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Resistance and Virulence Mechanisms of Escherichia coli Selected by Enrofloxacin in Chicken.

Authors:  Jun Li; Haihong Hao; Menghong Dai; Heying Zhang; Jianan Ning; Guyue Cheng; Muhammad Abu Bakr Shabbir; Abdul Sajid; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion and plasma protein binding of danofloxacin following intravenous administration in buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis).

Authors:  Ravinder Sappal; Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary; Harpal Singh Sandhu; Pritam Kaur Sidhu
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Exploring the collaboration between antibiotics and the immune response in the treatment of acute, self-limiting infections.

Authors:  Peter Ankomah; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Modification of enrofloxacin treatment regimens for poultry experimentally infected with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 to minimize selection of resistance.

Authors:  Luke P Randall; Sue W Cooles; Nick C Coldham; Ken S Stapleton; Laura J V Piddock; Martin J Woodward
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  The livestock reservoir for antimicrobial resistance: a personal view on changing patterns of risks, effects of interventions and the way forward.

Authors:  Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Comparison of the selection of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli during enrofloxacin administration with a local drug delivery system or with intramuscular injections in a swine model.

Authors:  Romain Béraud; Louis Huneault; Dave Bernier; Francis Beaudry; Ann Letellier; Jérôme R E del Castillo
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.310

8.  Impact of three ampicillin dosage regimens on selection of ampicillin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and excretion of blaTEM genes in swine feces.

Authors:  D Bibbal; V Dupouy; J P Ferré; P L Toutain; O Fayet; M F Prère; A Bousquet-Mélou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Selection and persistence of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli in the intestinal flora of pigs treated with amoxicillin, ceftiofur, or cefquinome.

Authors:  L M Cavaco; E Abatih; F M Aarestrup; L Guardabassi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In vivo activity of cefquinome against Escherichia coli in the thighs of neutropenic mice.

Authors:  Qi Shan; Chaoping Liang; Jing Wang; Jufeng Li; Zhenling Zeng
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.