Literature DB >> 13129551

Gastrointestinal symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Allen Foster1, Henry L Laws, Quintin H Gonzalez, Ronald H Clements.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y (RY) gastric bypass is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. However, little information is available regarding the gastrointestinal symptomatic outcome after laparoscopic RY gastric bypass for morbid obesity. The purpose of this study is to identify changes occurring in gastrointestinal symptoms after laparoscopic RY gastric bypass. A previously validated, 19-point gastrointestinal symptom questionnaire was administered prospectively to each patient seen for surgical consultation to treat morbid obesity. Patients rated the degree to which each symptom affected their lives on a 0 to 100 mm Liekert scale with 0 indicating absence of a symptom, 33 indicating the symptom was present occasionally, 67 indicating the symptom occurred frequently, and 100 indicating the symptom was continuous. The same survey was readministered 6 months postoperatively. The mean of each symptom (preoperative vs. postoperative value) was compared using Student's t test with significance at P<0.05. Forty-three preoperative patients (age 37.3+/-8.6 years; body mass index 47.8+/-4.9) and thirty-five, 6 months' postoperative patients (81% follow-up; body mass index 31.6+/-5.3) completed the questionnaire. The result for each symptom is expressed as mean+/-standard deviation of preoperative vs. postoperative scores. Significantly different symptoms include the following: abdominal pain 23.3+/-26.4 vs. 8.6+/-13.5, P=0.003; heartburn 34.0+/-26.6 vs. 8.0+/-14.0, P=0.0001; acid regurgitation 28.1+/-24.0 vs. 10.7+/-21.0, P=0.001; gnawing in epigastrium 19.3+/-22.7 vs. 7.5+/-16.0, P=0.01; abdominal distention 38.2+/-31.5 vs. 11.1+/-19.2, P=0.0001; eructation 27.7+/-24.4 vs. 15.5+/-16.9, P=0.01; increased flatus 40.2+/-25.7 vs. 25.2+/-25.3, P=0.005; decreased stools 5.4+/-16.8 vs. 17.4+/-20.0, P=0.0005; increased stools 23.9+/-26.7 vs. 6.5+/-11.7, P=0.0005; loose stools 29.7+/-26.5 vs. 17.5+/-20.0, P=0.03; urgent defecation 34.3+/-26.5 vs. 14.3+/-19.3, P=0.0009; difficulty falling asleep 44.1+/-38.4 vs. 27.5+/-32.9, P=0.05; insomnia 42.4+/-36.2 vs. 21.6+/-30.5, P=0.008; and rested on awakening 65.1+/-33.8 vs. 30.5+/-28.8, P=0.0001. Symptoms that did not significantly change included the following: nausea/vomiting 17.2+/-22.7 vs. 22.1+/-19.9, P=0.33; borborygmus 28.8+/-25.2 vs. 26.8+/-29.7, P=0.75; hard stools 10.3+/-22.9 vs. 7.1+/-18.6, P=0.56; incomplete evacuation of stool 17.2+/-22.8 vs. 13.4+/-21.7, P=0.45; and dysphagia 10.9+/-15.6 vs. 17.7+/-28.4, P=0.18. Laparoscopic RY gastric bypass significantly improves many gastrointestinal symptoms experienced by morbidly obese patients without adversely affecting any of the measured parameters. This information is useful in preoperative counseling to assure patients of overall symptomatic improvement after this operation in addition to significant weight loss and improvement of comorbid conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13129551     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(03)00092-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

Review 1.  The psychology of gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  J Glinski; S Wetzler; E Goodman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Esophageal perforation: an increasing challenge.

Authors:  J L Sawyers; C E Lane; J H Foster; R A Daniel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Results of Treatment of Perforation of the Esophagus.

Authors:  E E Jemerin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1948-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Palliation of malignant oesophageal perforation and proximal oesophageal malignant dysphagia with covered metal stents.

Authors:  A A Nicholson; C M Royston; K Wedgewood; R Milkins; A D Taylor
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Iatrogenic perforations of the esophagus. Therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  Y Wolloch; M Zer; M Dintsman; P Tiqva
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1974-03

6.  Symptomatic improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  E E Frezza; S Ikramuddin; W Gourash; T Rakitt; A Kingston; J Luketich; P Schauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a brief report.

Authors:  M P Dymek; D le Grange; K Neven; J Alverdy
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Quality of life in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. An improved evaluation of treatment regimens?

Authors:  E Dimenäs; H Glise; B Hallerbäck; H Hernqvist; J Svedlund; I Wiklund
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Sleep apnea syndrome in the morbidly obese as an indication for weight reduction surgery.

Authors:  J Peiser; P Lavie; A Ovnat; I Charuzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Plastic-covered metallic endoprostheses in the management of oesophageal perforation in patients with oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  A Watkinson; J Ellul; K Entwisle; M Farrugia; R Mason; A Adam
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Obesity and GERD: pathophysiology and effect of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Radu Tutuian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-06

2.  Ten years of follow-up of bilio-intestinal bypass: is malabsorption necessary for long-term metabolic results?

Authors:  Antonio Vitiello; Pilone Vincenzo; Antonio Formato; Giuliano Izzo; Luca Ferraro; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy on Pelvic Floor Disorders in Morbidly Obese Women: a Prospective Monocentric Pilot Study.

Authors:  Clémentine Mazoyer; Patrick Treacy; Laurent Turchi; Paul Antoine Lehur; Emmanuel Benizri; Antonio Iannelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Analysis of health-related quality-of-life instruments measuring the impact of bariatric surgery: systematic review of the instruments used and their content validity.

Authors:  Raed Tayyem; Abdulmajid Ali; John Atkinson; Colin R Martin
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  The relationship between obesity and functional gastrointestinal disorders: causation, association, or neither?

Authors:  Wayne Ho; Brennan M R Spiegel
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2008-08

6.  Gastrointestinal issues in the assessment and management of the obese patient.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Hussain; Eamonn M M Quigley
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-07

7.  Impact of Weight Loss Surgery on Esophageal Physiology.

Authors:  Rishi D Naik; Yash A Choksi; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-12

8.  The tip of the iceberg: the prevalence of functional gastrointestinal diseases in children.

Authors:  Samuel Nurko
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease in morbid obesity: the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Mariel A Mejía-Rivas; Alejandro Herrera-López; Jorge Hernández-Calleros; Miguel F Herrera; Miguel A Valdovinos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Impairment of gastrointestinal quality of life in severely obese patients.

Authors:  Po-Jui Yu; Ju-Juin Tsou; Wei-Jei Lee; Kuo-Ting Lee; Yi-Chih Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.