Literature DB >> 13129526

Parasite-induced trophic facilitation exploited by a non-host predator: a manipulator's nightmare.

Kim N Mouritsen1, Robert Poulin.   

Abstract

Parasites with complex life cycles, relying on trophic transmission to a definitive host, very often induce changes in the behaviour or appearance of their intermediate hosts. Because this usually makes the intermediate host vulnerable to predation by the definitive host, it is generally assumed that the parasite's transmission rate is increased, and that the modification of the host is, therefore, of great adaptive significance to the parasite. However, in the ecological "real world" other predators unsuitable as hosts may just as well take advantage of the facilitation process and significantly erode the benefit of host manipulation. Here we show that the intertidal New Zealand cockle (Austrovenus stutchburyi), manipulated by its echinostome trematode (Curtuteria australis) to rest on the sediment surface fully exposed to predation from the avian definitive host, is also subject to sublethal predation from a benthic feeding fish (Notolabrus celidotus, Labridae). The fish is targeting only the cockle-foot, in which the parasite preferentially encysts, reducing the infection intensity of manipulated cockles to levels comparable with those in non-manipulated, buried cockles. Based on the frequency and intensity of the foot cropping and predation rates on surfaced cockles by avian hosts, it is estimated that 2.5% of the parasite population in manipulated cockles is transmitted successfully whereas 17.1% is lost to fish. We argue that the adaptive significance of manipulation in the present system depends critically on the feeding behaviour of the definitive host. If cockles constitute the majority of prey items, there will be selection against manipulation. If manipulated cockles are taken as an easily accessible supplement to a diet composed mostly of other prey organisms, behavioural manipulation of the cockle host appears a high risk, high profit transmission strategy. Both these feeding behaviours of birds are known to occur in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13129526     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(03)00178-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  17 in total

1.  Host manipulation as a parasite transmission strategy when manipulation is exploited by non-host predators.

Authors:  Otto Seppälä; Jukka Jokela
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  When should a trophically and vertically transmitted parasite manipulate its intermediate host? The case of Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Maud Lélu; Michel Langlais; Marie-Lazarine Poulle; Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont; Sylvain Gandon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Host manipulation by parasites in the world of dead-end predators: adaptation to enhance transmission?

Authors:  Otto Seppälä; E Tellervo Valtonen; Daniel P Benesh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Parasite prevalence in intermediate hosts increases with waterbody age and abundance of final hosts.

Authors:  Zhuoyan Song; Heather Proctor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Hunger games: foraging behaviour and shelter use in fish under the context-dependent influence of parasitism.

Authors:  Brandon Ruehle; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Field evidence for non-host predator avoidance in a manipulated amphipod.

Authors:  Vincent Médoc; Jean-Nicolas Beisel
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-01-13

7.  The effects of toxoplasma infection on rodent behavior are dependent on dose of the stimulus.

Authors:  A Vyas; S-K Kim; R M Sapolsky
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Size-dependent pattern of metacercariae accumulation in Macomona liliana: the threshold for infection in a dead-end host.

Authors:  Tommy L F Leung; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 9.  Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links.

Authors:  Kevin D Lafferty; Stefano Allesina; Matias Arim; Cherie J Briggs; Giulio De Leo; Andrew P Dobson; Jennifer A Dunne; Pieter T J Johnson; Armand M Kuris; David J Marcogliese; Neo D Martinez; Jane Memmott; Pablo A Marquet; John P McLaughlin; Erin A Mordecai; Mercedes Pascual; Robert Poulin; David W Thieltges
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Parasitoid increases survival of its pupae by inducing hosts to fight predators.

Authors:  Amir H Grosman; Arne Janssen; Elaine F de Brito; Eduardo G Cordeiro; Felipe Colares; Juliana Oliveira Fonseca; Eraldo R Lima; Angelo Pallini; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.