Literature DB >> 13129458

Methane-suppressing effect of myristic acid in sheep as affected by dietary calcium and forage proportion.

Andrea Machmüller1, Andrea Machmüller1, Carla R Soliva, Michael Kreuzer.   

Abstract

The efficiency of myristic acid (14 : 0) as a feed additive to suppress CH4 emissions of ruminants was evaluated under different dietary conditions. Six sheep were subjected to a 6 x 6 Latin square arrangement. A supplement of non-esterified 14 : 0 (50 g/kg DM) was added to two basal diets differing in their forage:concentrate values (1 : 1.5 and 1 : 0.5), which were adjusted to dietary Ca contents of 4.2 and 9.0 g/kg DM, respectively. Comparisons were made with the unsupplemented basal diets (4.2 g Ca/kg DM). The 14 : 0 supplementation decreased (P<0.001) total tract CH4 release depending on basal diet type (interaction, P<0.001) and dietary Ca level (P<0.05, post hoc test). In the concentrate-based diet, 14 : 0 suppressed CH4 emission by 58 and 47 % with 4.2 and 9.0 g Ca/kg DM, respectively. The 14 : 0 effect was lower (22 %) in the forage-based diet and became insignificant with additional Ca. Myristic acid inhibited (P<0.05) rumen archaea without significantly altering proportions of individual methanogen orders. Ciliate protozoa concentration was decreased (P<0.05, post hoc test) by 14 : 0 only in combination with 9.0 g Ca/kg DM. Rumen fluid NH3 concentration and acetate:propionate were decreased (P<0.05) and water consumption was lower (P<0.01) with 14 : 0. The use of 14 : 0 had no clear effects on total tract organic matter and fibre digestion; this further illustrates that the suppressed methanogenesis resulted from direct effects against methanogens. The present study demonstrated that 14 : 0 is a potent CH4 inhibitor but, to be effective in CH4 mitigation feeding strategies, interactions with other diet ingredients have to be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13129458     DOI: 10.1079/bjn2003932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  11 in total

Review 1.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 3.  Effects of tea saponins on rumen microbiota, rumen fermentation, methane production and growth performance--a review.

Authors:  Jia-Kun Wang; Jun-An Ye; Jian-Xin Liu
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 4.  Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Sarah E Hook; André-Denis G Wright; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.273

5.  Phenolic Composition, Fermentation Profile, Protozoa Population and Methane Production from Sheanut (Butryospermum Parkii) Byproducts In vitro.

Authors:  Raghavendra Bhatta; Saravanan Mani; Luna Baruah; K T Sampath
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome.

Authors:  Weibing Shi; Christina D Moon; Sinead C Leahy; Dongwan Kang; Jeff Froula; Sandra Kittelmann; Christina Fan; Samuel Deutsch; Dragana Gagic; Henning Seedorf; William J Kelly; Renee Atua; Carrie Sang; Priya Soni; Dong Li; Cesar S Pinares-Patiño; John C McEwan; Peter H Janssen; Feng Chen; Axel Visel; Zhong Wang; Graeme T Attwood; Edward M Rubin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Nitrate decreases methane production also by increasing methane oxidation through stimulating NC10 population in ruminal culture.

Authors:  Lihui Liu; Xiurong Xu; Yangchun Cao; Chuanjiang Cai; Hongxiao Cui; Junhu Yao
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Methane Emissions and Milk Fatty Acid Profiles in Dairy Cows Fed Linseed, Measured at the Group Level in a Naturally Ventilated Housing and Individually in Respiration Chambers.

Authors:  Jernej Poteko; Sabine Schrade; Kerstin Zeyer; Joachim Mohn; Michael Zaehner; Johanna O Zeitz; Michael Kreuzer; Angela Schwarm
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  The Potential Role of Seaweeds in the Natural Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production.

Authors:  Margarida R G Maia; António J M Fonseca; Hugo M Oliveira; Carla Mendonça; Ana R J Cabrita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The transcriptome response of the ruminal methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium strain M1 to the inhibitor lauric acid.

Authors:  Xuan Zhou; Marc J A Stevens; Stefan Neuenschwander; Angela Schwarm; Michael Kreuzer; Anna Bratus-Neuenschwander; Johanna O Zeitz
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.