BACKGROUND: Dilatation of the ascending aorta concomitant with aortic valve disease is occasionally associated with progressive enlargement of the ascending aorta or acute aortic dissection (AAD). However, surgical procedure of choice for the aorta and its indication are controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1995 to August 2001, 10 patients with a moderately dilated ascending aorta (mean diameter, 52+/-4.8 mm) underwent concurrent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and aortoplasty. The aortic valve was bicuspid in eight patients. To tailor the ascending aorta 30-35 mm in diameter, the aortic wall was partially resected along the aortotomy, and the aorta was directly closed. RESULTS: Operation time and most of other perioperative variables were comparable to those of patients who underwent isolated AVR. The aortic diameter was reduced to 36.1+/-4.1 mm. Nine patients survived to hospital discharge uneventfully, but one patient developed disruption of the suture line in the aorta and died. During follow-up, no patient suffered AAD but redilatation was observed in one patient. In the two problematic patients, the ascending aorta was larger than 55 mm, and its media was histologically abnormal. CONCLUSION: In patients with dilated ascending aorta less than 55 mm in diameter, aortoplasty can be a procedure of choice. However, a prosthetic graft replacement is recommended when the diameter of the ascending aorta is larger than 55 mm.
BACKGROUND: Dilatation of the ascending aorta concomitant with aortic valve disease is occasionally associated with progressive enlargement of the ascending aorta or acute aortic dissection (AAD). However, surgical procedure of choice for the aorta and its indication are controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1995 to August 2001, 10 patients with a moderately dilated ascending aorta (mean diameter, 52+/-4.8 mm) underwent concurrent aortic valve replacement (AVR) and aortoplasty. The aortic valve was bicuspid in eight patients. To tailor the ascending aorta 30-35 mm in diameter, the aortic wall was partially resected along the aortotomy, and the aorta was directly closed. RESULTS: Operation time and most of other perioperative variables were comparable to those of patients who underwent isolated AVR. The aortic diameter was reduced to 36.1+/-4.1 mm. Nine patients survived to hospital discharge uneventfully, but one patient developed disruption of the suture line in the aorta and died. During follow-up, no patient suffered AAD but redilatation was observed in one patient. In the two problematic patients, the ascending aorta was larger than 55 mm, and its media was histologically abnormal. CONCLUSION: In patients with dilated ascending aorta less than 55 mm in diameter, aortoplasty can be a procedure of choice. However, a prosthetic graft replacement is recommended when the diameter of the ascending aorta is larger than 55 mm.
Authors: Arndt H Kiessling; Eva Odwody; Alexandra Miskovic; Ulrich A Stock; Andreas Zierer; Anton Moritz Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 1.637