Literature DB >> 13129303

Carotenoid compounds in grapes and their relationship to plant water status.

C Oliveira1, A C Silva Ferreira, M Mendes Pinto, T Hogg, F Alves, P Guedes de Pinho.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the relationship between carotenoid contents in grapevine berries and plant water status. For this purpose, a black grapevine variety, Vitis vinifera L. cv. Touriga Nacional, was studied. The experiments were carried out in the same Douro vineyards, with plants of the same age, in two different water retention soils. A higher water retention capacity soil, soil A, and a lower water retention capacity soil, soil B, were both in a 1.2 m deep silt-loam schist-derived soil. The training system was the double cordon trained and spur pruned. A first range was nonirrigated (NI) and a second one was irrigated (I), 60% of evapotranspiration (ET(0)). For soil B, a 30% of ET(0) treatment was also applied. The plant water status was estimated by predawn leaf water potential. The effects of plant water status on berry growth were studied by measurement of the berry weight and total soluble solids (degrees Brix). The carotenoid profile was quantitatively determined by high-performance liquid chromatography/diode array. Carotenoids determined were beta-carotene, lutein, neoxanthin, violaxanthin, and luteoxanthin. The comparison between irrigated and nonirrigated grapes was followed from 2 weeks before veraison until the ripe stage. Results showed that at harvest time, berries exposed to the NI had a lower weight than those exposed to the irrigated treatment (60% of ET(0)), 0.89 vs 1.36 g/berry and 0.94 vs 1.34 g/berry, for soils A and B, respectively. The irrigated treatment contributed to a higher sugar concentration in both soils. However, depending on the soil water retention capacity, the carotenoid contents were different in soils A and B. For soil A, the total carotenoid content was similar for both NI and I treatments. However, with regard to soil B, in irrigated treatment, levels of carotenoids were approximately 60% lower than those found for the NI. It seems to be possible to produce higher weight berries (with higher sugar levels) with similar carotenoid contents. On the other hand, soil characteristics had a larger influence than irrigation on the concentration of carotenoids in grapes, resulting in an important viticultural parameter to take into account in aroma precursor formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13129303     DOI: 10.1021/jf034275k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  9 in total

1.  Grapevine Plasticity in Response to an Altered Microclimate: Sauvignon Blanc Modulates Specific Metabolites in Response to Increased Berry Exposure.

Authors:  Philip R Young; Hans A Eyeghe-Bickong; Kari du Plessis; Erik Alexandersson; Dan A Jacobson; Zelmari Coetzee; Alain Deloire; Melané A Vivier
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Water deficit alters differentially metabolic pathways affecting important flavor and quality traits in grape berries of Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay.

Authors:  Laurent G Deluc; David R Quilici; Alain Decendit; Jérôme Grimplet; Matthew D Wheatley; Karen A Schlauch; Jean-Michel Mérillon; John C Cushman; Grant R Cramer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Carotenoids, total polyphenols and antioxidant activity of grapes (Vitis vinifera) cultivated in organic and conventional systems.

Authors:  Claudiu-Ioan Bunea; Nastasia Pop; Anca Cristina Babeş; Cristian Matea; Francisc V Dulf; Andrea Bunea
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  The genes and enzymes of the carotenoid metabolic pathway in Vitis vinifera L.

Authors:  Philip R Young; Justin G Lashbrooke; Erik Alexandersson; Dan Jacobson; Claudio Moser; Riccardo Velasco; Melané A Vivier
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Genome-wide identification and characterization of genes involved in carotenoid metabolic in three stages of grapevine fruit development.

Authors:  Xiangpeng Leng; Peipei Wang; Chen Wang; Xudong Zhu; Xiaopeng Li; Hongyan Li; Qian Mu; Ao Li; Zhongjie Liu; Jinggui Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Postharvest Water Loss of Wine Grape: When, What and Why.

Authors:  Chiara Sanmartin; Margherita Modesti; Francesca Venturi; Stefano Brizzolara; Fabio Mencarelli; Andrea Bellincontro
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-05-14

7.  Search for transcriptional and metabolic markers of grape pre-ripening and ripening and insights into specific aroma development in three Portuguese cultivars.

Authors:  Patricia Agudelo-Romero; Alexander Erban; Lisete Sousa; Maria Salomé Pais; Joachim Kopka; Ana Margarida Fortes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  1,1,6-Trimethyl-1,2-dihydronaphthalene (TDN) Sensory Thresholds in Riesling Wine.

Authors:  Andrii Tarasov; Nicoló Giuliani; Alexey Dobrydnev; Christoph Schuessler; Yulian Volovenko; Doris Rauhut; Rainer Jung
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-05-09

9.  Impact of Deficit Irrigation on Grapevine cv. 'Touriga Nacional' during Three Seasons in Douro Region: An Agronomical and Metabolomics Approach.

Authors:  Inês L Cabral; António Teixeira; Arnaud Lanoue; Marianne Unlubayir; Thibaut Munsch; Joana Valente; Fernando Alves; Pedro Leal da Costa; Frank S Rogerson; Susana M P Carvalho; Hernâni Gerós; Jorge Queiroz
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.