Literature DB >> 1310836

Underutilization of Rh prophylaxis in the emergency department: a retrospective survey.

J Grant1, M Hyslop.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the practice of emergency physicians with regard to the issue of Rh isoimmunization.
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review.
SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary care hospital emergency department. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women presenting with a risk factor for Rh sensitization.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patient encounters were analyzed descriptively as to whether they were candidates for Rh immune prophylaxis, and if so, whether it was given. Most (68%) were hospitalized. Of those, all were Rh typed, but two patients were not given Rh immune globulin (RhIG) when indicated. Of those discharged from the ED, most (86%) were not Rh typed, and none was administered RhIG.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a need for increased attention to the potential for Rh isoimmunization in patients presenting to the ED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1310836     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)80162-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  3 in total

1.  Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in the treatment of threatened miscarriage in the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  L Weinberg
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Use of anti-D in an accident and emergency department.

Authors:  A M Huggon; D P Watson
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1993-12

Review 3.  Appropriate provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women: a scoping review.

Authors:  Trina M Fyfe; M Jane Ritchey; Christorina Taruc; Daniel Crompton; Brian Galliford; Rose Perrin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.