Literature DB >> 1310456

Relative amount of albuterol delivered to lung receptors from a metered-dose inhaler and nebulizer solution. Bioassay by histamine bronchoprovocation.

K V Blake1, M Hoppe, E Harman, L Hendeles.   

Abstract

The results of previous studies comparing bronchodilatation from beta agonists administered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and nebulizer solution have been conflicting. We therefore evaluated a range of albuterol doses administered by these two methods, using histamine bronchoprovocation as a bioassay for the amount of drug reaching the beta 2 receptors in the lung. Twelve stable asthmatic volunteers received, in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design on different days, placebo or one, two, four, or six puffs from an MDI attached to an InspirEase device (90 micrograms per puff) or 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, or 5.0 mg of solution delivered in 2 ml of buffered saline through a Hudson Updraft II nebulizer. The histamine concentration required to decrease FEV1 by 20 percent (PC20) was measured 1 h before and 30 min after administration of each treatment and expressed as the increase in PC20 from baseline. The dose-response curves for change in PC20 indicated that the higher doses of the nebulizer solution delivered more drug to beta 2 receptors in the lung than the lower doses from the MDI. For example, the geometric mean increase in PC20 was 1.1 +/- 1.6 (SD) after placebo, 7.5 +/- 2.7 after two puffs from the MDI, and 20.0 +/- 2.1 after 2.5 mg of nebulizer solution (p less than 0.05). Using this bioassay method and administration technique, we estimated that ten puffs from the MDI (0.9 mg) would deliver approximately the same amount of albuterol to lung receptors as 2.5 mg of the nebulizer solution. Taking into account previously published reports and the results of the present study, we conclude that differences in dose, administration technique, nebulizer system efficiency, and severity of airway obstruction can alter the amount of drug reaching the beta 2 receptors in the lungs and, thus, the clinical response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1310456     DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.2.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

Review 1.  Discriminating measures of bronchodilator drug efficacy and potency.

Authors:  H Buck; M Parry-Billings
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  A randomised controlled trial to assess the relative benefits of large volume spacers and nebulisers to treat acute asthma in hospital.

Authors:  A L Dewar; A Stewart; J J Cogswell; G J Connett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Methacholine challenge as a clinical bioassay of pulmonary delivery of a long-acting β₂-adrenergic agonist.

Authors:  Sreekala Prabhakaran; Jonathan Shuster; Richard Ahrens; Leslie Hendeles
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.705

4.  Two vs four puffs of albuterol: does dose change bronchodilator response?

Authors:  Anne V McLaughlin; Anita Bhandari; Craig M Schramm
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2019-01-31

5.  Safety of daily albuterol in infants with a history of bronchospasm: a multi-center placebo controlled trial.

Authors:  James A Hedrick; James W Baker; Arthur B Atlas; Aftab A Naz; William R Lincourt; Roopa Trivedi; Anna Ellworth; Angela M Davis
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2009-07-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.