Literature DB >> 1308662

Which medical schools produce rural physicians?

R A Rosenblatt1, M E Whitcomb, T J Cullen, D M Lishner, L G Hart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that medical schools vary systematically and predictably in the proportion of their graduates who enter rural practice.
DESIGN: The December 1991 version of the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile was used to examine the rural and urban practice locations of physicians who graduated from American medical schools between 1976 and 1985. Selected characteristics of the medical schools--including location, ownership, and funding--were linked to the Physician Masterfile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of the graduates from each medical school who were practicing in rural areas in December 1991, disaggregated by physician specialty.
RESULTS: Of the practicing graduates from our study, 12.6% were located in rural counties; family physicians were much more likely than members of other specialties to select rural practice, particularly in the smallest and most isolated rural counties. Women were much less likely than men to enter rural practice. Medical schools varied greatly in the percentage of their graduates who entered rural practice, ranging from 41.2% to 2.3% of the graduating classes studied. Twelve medical schools accounted for over one quarter of the physicians entering rural practice in this time period. Four variables were strongly associated with a tendency to produce rural graduates: location in a rural state, public ownership, production of family physicians, and smaller amounts of funding from the National Institutes of Health. DISCUSSION: The organization, location, and mission of medical schools is closely related to the propensity of their graduates to select rural practice. Increasing policy coordination among medical schools and state and federal governmental entities would most effectively address residual problems of rural physician shortages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1308662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

1.  Does the site of postgraduate family medicine training predict performance on summative examinations? A comparison of urban and remote programs.

Authors:  R J McKendry; N Busing; D W Dauphinee; C A Brailovsky; A P Boulais
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Physicians and rural America.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; L G Hart
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-11

Review 3.  A review of e-learning practices for undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Francis Lau; Joanna Bates
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Training and practising in small communities.

Authors:  James Goertzen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Physician supply in rural Canada. Can urban medical schools produce rural physicians?

Authors:  M Godwin; J Lailey; R Miller; D Moores; E Parsons
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Women family physicians and rural medicine. Can the grass be greener in the country.

Authors:  L L Rourke; J Rourke; J B Brown
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Policy on training for rural practice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Perceptions of newly admitted undergraduate medical students on experiential training on community placements and working in rural areas of Uganda.

Authors:  Dan K Kaye; Andrew Mwanika; Patrick Sekimpi; Joshua Tugumisirize; Nelson Sewankambo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Advanced but expensive technology. Balancing affordability with access in rural areas.

Authors:  K A Erickson; K R MacKenzie; A J Marshall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Medical education and the retention of rural physicians.

Authors:  D E Pathman; T R Konrad; T C Ricketts
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.