Literature DB >> 1308198

Inverted-U relationship between the level of peripheral corticosterone and the magnitude of hippocampal primed burst potentiation.

D M Diamond1, M C Bennett, M Fleshner, G M Rose.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that peripheral levels of corticosterone correlate with the magnitudes of two well-described physiological models of memory, long-term potentiation (LTP) and primed burst (PB) potentiation. In the present experiments, the authors investigated the effects of experimenter-controlled manipulations of the levels of corticosterone on the magnitude of hippocampal PB potentiation in urethane-anesthetized rats. Primed burst potentiation is a long-lasting (at least 30 minutes) increase in the amplitude of the CA1 population spike and EPSP slope in response to physiologically patterned stimulation of the hippocampal commissure. The levels of serum corticosterone were controlled by implanting corticosterone pellets in adrenalectomized rats (ADX/PELLET). In the first experiment, a significant negative linear correlation between elevated (stress) levels of serum corticosterone (greater than 20 micrograms/dL) and the magnitude of PB potentiation in ADX/PELLET subjects (r = 0.60, P < .05) was found. In the second experiment, the shape of the corticosterone-PB potentiation function was different at low and intermediate levels of corticosterone than it was at high levels of corticosterone: There was a positive correlation at low levels (0-10 micrograms/dL), a peak response at intermediate levels (11-20 micrograms/dL), and a negative correlation at high levels (21-93 micrograms/dL) of corticosterone. Thus, the overall relationship between corticosterone and PB potentiation is an inverted-U function. These findings provide strong support for the hypothesis that corticosterone exerts a concentration-dependent biphasic influence on the expression of hippocampal plasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1308198     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.450020409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  158 in total

Review 1.  Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus during afferent activation reproducing the pattern of the theta rhythm (theta plasticity).

Authors:  A M Kleshchevnikov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Allostasis, allostatic load, and the aging nervous system: role of excitatory amino acids and excitotoxicity.

Authors:  B S McEwen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Amygdala is critical for stress-induced modulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation and learning.

Authors:  J J Kim; H J Lee; J S Han; M G Packard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Amygdala-hippocampus dynamic interaction in relation to memory.

Authors:  G Richter-Levin; I Akirav
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2000 Aug-Dec       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  Mechanisms for acute stress-induced enhancement of glutamatergic transmission and working memory.

Authors:  E Y Yuen; W Liu; I N Karatsoreos; Y Ren; J Feng; B S McEwen; Z Yan
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 15.992

6.  Lack of tissue glucocorticoid reactivation in 11beta -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 knockout mice ameliorates age-related learning impairments.

Authors:  J L Yau; J Noble; C J Kenyon; C Hibberd; Y Kotelevtsev; J J Mullins; J R Seckl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Repeated stress causes cognitive impairment by suppressing glutamate receptor expression and function in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Eunice Y Yuen; Jing Wei; Wenhua Liu; Ping Zhong; Xiangning Li; Zhen Yan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Site and time dependent effects of acute stress on hippocampal long-term potentiation in freely behaving rats.

Authors:  Kazuo Yamada; Bruce S McEwen; Constantine Pavlides
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Genomic and epigenomic mechanisms of glucocorticoids in the brain.

Authors:  Jason D Gray; Joshua F Kogan; Jordan Marrocco; Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 10.  Steroids and injury to the developing brain: net harm or net benefit?

Authors:  Shadi N Malaeb; Barbara S Stonestreet
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.