| Literature DB >> 130806 |
A B Gazzaniga, W W Stanton, R H Bartlett.
Abstract
Laparoscopy was evaluated in thirty-seven patients from a group of 132 consecutive patients who were treated for blunt or penetrating injury to the abdomen. A total of twenty-three patients underwent laparoscopy and laparotomy. The findings at laparotomy correlated with laparoscopy. Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopy only, and there were no proved false-negative results. Of the 132 patients considered for laparotomy, 118 underwent abdominal exploration. Laparotomy was considered unnecessary in twenty-five of the 118 patients (21 per cent) and in retrospect, laparoscopy could have identified in each patient the presence of a minor injury or no injury at all. Laparoscopy is a useful method for evaluating blunt and penetrating injuries to the abdomen in selected patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1976 PMID: 130806 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(76)90124-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Surg ISSN: 0002-9610 Impact factor: 2.565