Literature DB >> 1306040

Large-volume suction lipectomy: an analysis of 108 patients.

E H Courtiss1, R J Choucair, M B Donelan.   

Abstract

Suction lipectomy was initially advocated for the treatment of localized collections of fat and for the removal of less than 1500 ml of material. However, many patients wished to have multiple areas treated or had diffuse collections of fat. In such instances, the removal of over 1500 ml of material and circumferential lipectomy are necessary to provide optimal aesthetic results. However, when over 1500 ml of material is removed, anesthetic requirements, fluid replacement, and treatment of blood loss become important if the operation is to be performed safely. We have treated 108 patients who had over 1500 ml of material removed. Eight-eight percent of the patients were female; 12 percent were male. Using the body-mass index, 3 percent of patients were underweight, 70 percent were normal weight, and 27 percent were overweight. Fifty-five patients (51 percent) had 1500 to 2499 ml of material removed, 26 patients (24 percent) had 2500 to 3499 ml removed, 16 patients (15 percent) had 3500 to 4499 ml removed, and 11 patients (10 percent) had over 4500 ml removed. All patients were treated in the hospital; 44 percent were admitted after surgery. A total of 227 units of autologous and 2 units of homologous blood were transfused. As measured by a computerized monitor, the average amount of blood in the material removed from thighs was 30 percent; from abdomens, the blood loss was 45 percent. The aesthetic results were generally excellent. No complications were encountered. A few patients developed undesired sequelae, the most common of which was seroma formation, which occurred in 19 percent of those who had suction of abdominal-wall fat. We believe that large-volume suction lipectomy is safe and efficacious, provided attention is directed to such important aspects of patient care as anesthesia, fluid replacement, and blood loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1306040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Liposuction infiltration: The Quito formula - a new approach based on an old concept.

Authors:  Iván Marcelo Cueva Galárraga
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2011

2.  Wetting solutions in aspirative lipoplasty: a plea for safety in liposuction.

Authors:  P B Fodor
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Syringe liposculpture revisited.

Authors:  M A Mandel
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Experience with tumescent technique in lipoplasty.

Authors:  S L Replogle
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Blood loss during liposuction using the tumescent technique.

Authors:  F Samdal; P F Amland; J F Bugge
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Tumescent liposuction: a review.

Authors:  Jayashree Venkataram
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-07

7.  Ureteral tear at the ureteropelvic junction: a complication of liposuction.

Authors:  Taj M Kattapuram; Laura L Avery
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-03-04

Review 8.  Unfavourable outcomes of liposuction and their management.

Authors:  Varun V Dixit; Milind S Wagh
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05

9.  A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Study of Tissue Liquefaction Liposuction vs Suction-Assisted Liposuction.

Authors:  Joseph P Hunstad; Christopher P Godek; Bruce W Van Natta; Bill G Kortesis; Gaurav Bharti; John C Crantford; Mark A Daniels; Mark S Andrew
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 4.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.