Literature DB >> 1305124

Comparison of lethal mutations of Drosophila melanogaster with D. simulans when detected by the attached-X method.

Y Inoue1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the attached-X method compared with the standard Basc method, and, using this method, to find out whether the observed differences in genetic polymorphisms are related to differences in lethal mutation rates in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. When EMS-treated Drosophila melanogaster males are mated to untreated attached-X females, a decrease in the progeny sex ratio (male/female + male) is observed due to the induced lethal mutations on the X chromosome. The decrease in the frequency of male progeny were shown as the attached-X index. The expected male number is calculated from the control sex ratio. The difference between the expected and the observed male numbers, expressed as the ratio to the expected male number, defines the attached-X index. The index values for various EMS concentrations were compared to the lethal frequencies obtained by the standard Basc method for the same EMS treatments, and gave a highly positive correlation (gamma = 0.993, p < 0.01, d.f. = 2), thus providing an alternative method for evaluation of possible mutagens. The attached-X method was applied to D. simulans, of which natural populations are known to have relatively low genetic variation, and frequencies of the EMS-induced X chromosome lethal mutations were estimated and compared with those in D. melanogaster. The results indicate that D. melanogaster is slightly more sensitive in the sperm and spermatogonial stages, but less susceptible in the spermatid stage when compared with D. simulans.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1305124     DOI: 10.1007/bf00240557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  9 in total

1.  Relationships within the melanogaster species subgroup of the genus Drosophila (Sophophora) i. inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  M Ashburner; F Lemeunier
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1976-04-13

2.  The spontaneous mutation rate in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  J C Eeken; A W de Jong; M M Green
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Cytogenetic Analysis of the Action of Carcinogens and Tumour Inhibitors in Drosophila Melanogaster. IX. the Cell-Stage Response of the Male Germ Line to the Mesyloxy Esters.

Authors:  O G Fahmy; M J Fahmy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A Comparison of the Salivary Gland Chromosomes of Drosophila Melanogaster and D. Simulans.

Authors:  I H Horton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1939-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  [Sensitivity of the Drosophila testis to the mutagenic action of X-rays].

Authors:  C AUERBACH
Journal:  Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl       Date:  1954

6.  Molecular dosimetry of the mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate in Drosophila melanogaster spermatozoa: linear relation of DNA alkylation per sperm cell (dose) to sex-linked recessive lethals.

Authors:  C S Aaron; W R Lee
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  A comparison of gene-enzyme variation between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  E M Berger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A study of the causes underlying the differences in radiosensitivity between mature spermatozoa and late spermatids in Drosophila.

Authors:  F H Sobels
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1969 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  A search for some common characteristics of the effects of chemical mutagens in Drosophila.

Authors:  E W Vogel; W G Blijleven; M J Kortselius; J A Zijlstra
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1982-02-22       Impact factor: 2.433

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.