Literature DB >> 1305032

Mersilene (polyester), a new suture for penetrating keratoplasty.

J A Ramselaar1, W H Beekhuis, W J Rijneveld, M V van Andel, F Dijk, W L Jongebloed.   

Abstract

Mersilene (polyester monofilament) seems to be suitable for penetrating keratoplasty because it is strong, shows no degradation by ultraviolet light, is insoluble, so that it can be left in situ, and offers the possibility of regulating postoperative astigmatism by suture adjustment. In 12 patients penetrating keratoplasty was performed with the combined interrupted/running suturing technique, using eight interrupted nylon 10-0 sutures and one running Mersilene 11-0 suture. The results were compared with those of 25 patients in whom eight interrupted nylon 10-0 sutures and one running nylon 11-0 suture were used. Six months after penetrating keratoplasty, no differences could be found between the two groups in keratometric astigmatism, visual acuity or slitlamp findings. In three patients postoperative adjustment of the running Mersilene suture reduced astigmatism by 50, 90 and 100% respectively. In an animal study the behaviour of Mersilene in the cornea was evaluated by slitlamp examination, histology and electron-microscopy. The tissue response to Mersilene was minimal. Considering the resemblance to nylon in clinical findings, minimal tissue response, lack of biodegradation and possibility of regulating postoperative astigmatism by suture adjustment, Mersilene seems to be a suitable material for penetrating keratoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1305032     DOI: 10.1007/bf00156998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  [Astigmatism following cataract surgery: comparison following wound closure with nylon suture and Mersilene].

Authors:  F Bigar
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 0.700

2.  Stainless steel as suturing material in human- and rabbit corneas: a SEM-study.

Authors:  W L Jongebloed; W J Rijneveld; P L Cuperus; P van Andel; J G Worst
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Comparison of the reaction of the cornea to nylon and stainless steel sutures: an animal study.

Authors:  W J Rijneveld; W L Jongebloed; J G Worst; W A Houtman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Suture reaction in the rabbit cornea.

Authors:  S B Aronson; T E Moore
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-10

5.  An evaluation of ultrastrong polyethylene fiber as an ophthalmic suture.

Authors:  B E Cohan; J W Leenslag; J Miles; A J Pennings
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-12

6.  The ideal suture material.

Authors:  A W Ulin
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1971-09

7.  Comparison of tissue reaction to nylon and prolene sutures in rabbit iris and cornea.

Authors:  S E Kelly; J Ehlers; I Llovera; R C Troutman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1975

8.  Running nylon suture dissolution after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  B E Frueh; S T Feldman; R M Feldman; N P Sossi; J Frucht-Pery; S I Brown
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Controlled reduction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.

Authors:  G A Stainer; T Perl; P S Binder
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Adjustment of single continuous suture to control astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  J I McNeill; I F Wessels
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.