Literature DB >> 1303372

Protection hypothesis for composite wear.

S C Bayne1, D F Taylor, H O Heymann.   

Abstract

Significant occlusal wear occurs on posterior composite restorations in areas without direct contact with opponent teeth (contact-free wear) in addition to wear at the contacts. Recent research has indicated that all occlusal posterior composite surfaces wear, and those surfaces show decreasing wear rates over time. This provides more evidence for an earlier theory proposed by Jørgensen et al. (1979) that composite contact-free wear is a function of access and attrition caused by small particles in the food bolus. This hypothesis is now called the "protection theory" or "protection hypothesis" for wear. Macroscopic protection or "sheltering" from wear is provided by cavity preparation walls. Microscopic protection against resin matrix wear is provided by filler particles that are close together. Clinical evidence supporting the protection hypothesis comes from recently confirmed low wear rates for microfill and hybrid composites. The objective of this work was to calculate the minimum inter-particle spacing required for microscopic protection (wear resistance) for composites based on assumptions of packing fractions (0.68) with small particles (0.02 microns radius) for dispersed versus agglomerated conditions. An inter-particle spacing (IPS) of < 0.10 microns was assumed to afford wear protection. The results are that only 1.5-6.0 volume percentage microfiller is theoretically required to generate an IPS of 0.1 micron for composite microscopic protection. However, microfiller particles are suspected to agglomerate into clusters. Modified calculations for that effect indicate that at least 35% filler is required to provide microscopic protection. This effect explains much of the 3 to 5 year clinical research results for microfills and hybrids.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1303372     DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90105-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  20 in total

1.  An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins.

Authors:  Liqun Cao; Xinyi Zhao; Xu Gong; Shouliang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-06-26

2.  Micromechanics for Fiber Volume Percent With a Photocure Vinyl Ester Composite.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen; Jack E Lemons; Michael S McCracken
Journal:  Polym Compos       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.171

3.  Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials.

Authors:  Mike Matzinger; Sebastian Hahnel; Verena Preis; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Advancing Discontinuous Fiber-Reinforced Composites above Critical Length for Replacing Current Dental Composites and Amalgam.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2017-02

5.  Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  T C Fagundes; T J E Barata; E Bresciani; D F G Cefaly; M F F Jorge; M F L Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Mechanical Properties Comparing Composite Fiber Length to Amalgam.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen; Perng-Ru Liu
Journal:  J Compos       Date:  2016

7.  Important Dental Fiber-Reinforced Composite Molding Compound Breakthroughs.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen
Journal:  EC Dent Sci       Date:  2017-05-02

8.  Nanohybrid and microfilled hybrid versus conventional hybrid composite restorations: 5-year clinical wear performance.

Authors:  Senthamaraiselvi Palaniappan; Liesbeth Elsen; Inge Lijnen; Marleen Peumans; Bart Van Meerbeek; Paul Lambrechts
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Influence of cleaning methods after 3D printing on two-body wear and fracture load of resin-based temporary crown and bridge material.

Authors:  Johannes Mayer; Bogna Stawarczyk; Konstantin Vogt; Reinhard Hickel; Daniel Edelhoff; Marcel Reymus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Frank Engelhardt; Sebastian Hahnel; Verena Preis; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.