Literature DB >> 1299257

Effect of rubber dam isolation on restoration deterioration.

R J Smales1.   

Abstract

The consequence of using either rubber dam or cotton roll isolation on the subsequent clinical deterioration of 546 polished amalgam and 148 anterior enamel-bonded resin composite restorations was evaluated over periods of up to 15 and 10 years, respectively. Double-blind assessments for several clinical factors or parameters of the restorations were made using both direct and indirect observation methods. The transformed rating scores obtained were evaluated using a mixed model analysis of variance. With very few exceptions, all restoration placements were of high quality, and there were relatively few unsatisfactory rating scores given for any of the clinical factors assessed over the study. The low mean deterioration scores for most of the clinical factors assessed were also fairly similar, irrespective of the isolation method used. Therefore, although a statistically significant difference was found between the two isolation methods for marginal fracture of the composites, the clinical relevance of this difference is questionable.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1299257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  4 in total

1.  Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.

Authors:  A M Kemoli; W E van Amerongen; G N Opinya
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Chunjie Li; He Yuan; May Cm Wong; Jing Zou; Zongdao Shi; Xuedong Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients.

Authors:  Cheng Miao; Xiaoyu Yang; May Cm Wong; Jing Zou; Xuedong Zhou; Chunjie Li; Yan Wang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-17

Review 4.  Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Helen V Worthington; Sara Khangura; Kelsey Seal; Monika Mierzwinski-Urban; Analia Veitz-Keenan; Philipp Sahrmann; Patrick Roger Schmidlin; Dell Davis; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; María Graciela Rasines Alcaraz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.