Literature DB >> 1299252

Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results.

S L Wendt1, K F Leinfelder.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a resin composite inlay system in clinical trials involving human subjects. A total of 60 restorations were inserted equally in Class I and II preparations and in premolars and molars. A glass ionomer liner was applied to the dentin. Light-cured direct inlays were fabricated in the oral environment. Thirty inlays were heat-treated for 7.5 minutes at 125 degrees C in a dry heat oven. Enamel margins of the preparations were etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel. All inlays were cemented with a light-cured enamel bonding resin. Restorations were evaluated using the USPHS system and M-L indirect scale. Six, 12, 24 and 36-month recalls were compared to baseline. Color, interfacial staining, secondary caries, and wear were unchanged from baseline for all restorations. Marginal integrity and surface texture show a differential change from baseline and with respect to restoration type. Indirect wear was not significantly different between restoration types (P < 0.05). Wear resistance was not significantly improved with heat treatment, but marginal integrity and surface characteristics showed marked improvement in the heat-treated group at 24 and 36-month recalls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1299252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  6 in total

1.  What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations.

Authors:  B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

2.  Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation.

Authors:  Ulla Pallesen; Vibeke Qvist
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Indirect resin composites.

Authors:  Suresh Nandini
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-10

4.  Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure.

Authors:  Khalid M Abdelaziz; Ahmed A Saleh
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Fracture resistance of lab composite versus all-ceramic restorations in class II inlay cavity preparations: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Smridhi Bhanot; Pardeep Mahajan; Nitika Bajaj; Prashant Monga; Amit Sood; Rishidev Yadav
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-06-13

6.  Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations.

Authors:  Nurcan Ozakar-Ilday; Yahya-Orcun Zorba; Mehmet Yildiz; Vildan Erdem; Nilgun Seven; Sezer Demirbuga
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-05-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.