BACKGROUND: Patients treated for lesions in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (P-LAD) have worse outcome after balloon angioplasty as compared to patients treated for lesions in the distal left anterior descending coronary artery (D-LAD). We sought to examine if this discrepancy was still observed after stenting. METHODS: A total of 676 consecutive patients with a symptomatic monovessel disease in the LAD artery who underwent angioplasty with stenting were prospectively entered into a dedicated database. Among this cohort, 322 lesions were located in P-LAD and 354 in D-LAD. Patients with total occlusion, acute myocardial infarction (MI) or restenosis were excluded. RESULTS: Procedural characteristics were similar in the two groups. Procedural success was high with the same rates of in-hospital death and Q-wave MI for patients treated in P-LAD and D-LAD. At 1 year, the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 13.9% in the P-LAD group and 16.3% in the D-LAD group (P = .79), and the rate of event-free survival was 81.9% and 81% (P = .67), respectively. The treatment of ostial lesions (n = 23) was not related to worse outcome. In multivariate analysis, lesion location was not a predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). CONCLUSION: This study shows that stenting of lesions in the P-LAD is as effective and safe as treatment of lesions located in D-LAD. Therefore, when stenting is feasible, the location of the lesion in the LAD is not predictive of worse outcome and, consequently, should not be taken into account in the choice of the revascularization strategy.
BACKGROUND:Patients treated for lesions in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (P-LAD) have worse outcome after balloon angioplasty as compared to patients treated for lesions in the distal left anterior descending coronary artery (D-LAD). We sought to examine if this discrepancy was still observed after stenting. METHODS: A total of 676 consecutive patients with a symptomatic monovessel disease in the LAD artery who underwent angioplasty with stenting were prospectively entered into a dedicated database. Among this cohort, 322 lesions were located in P-LAD and 354 in D-LAD. Patients with total occlusion, acute myocardial infarction (MI) or restenosis were excluded. RESULTS: Procedural characteristics were similar in the two groups. Procedural success was high with the same rates of in-hospital death and Q-wave MI for patients treated in P-LAD and D-LAD. At 1 year, the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 13.9% in the P-LAD group and 16.3% in the D-LAD group (P = .79), and the rate of event-free survival was 81.9% and 81% (P = .67), respectively. The treatment of ostial lesions (n = 23) was not related to worse outcome. In multivariate analysis, lesion location was not a predictor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). CONCLUSION: This study shows that stenting of lesions in the P-LAD is as effective and safe as treatment of lesions located in D-LAD. Therefore, when stenting is feasible, the location of the lesion in the LAD is not predictive of worse outcome and, consequently, should not be taken into account in the choice of the revascularization strategy.
Authors: Mohammad Alidoosti; Mojtaba Salarifar; Ali Mohammad Haji Zeinali; Seyed Ebrahim Kassaian; Maria Raissi Dehkordi Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2007-03-04 Impact factor: 2.298