BACKGROUND: We report on the study design and protocols of two randomized controlled trials (Acupuncture Randomized Trials = ART) that investigate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis of the knee, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether acupuncture is more efficacious than (a) no treatment or (b) minimal acupuncture in the treatment of low back pain and osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Two randomized, controlled, multicenter trials with three treatment arms and a total follow-up time of 52 weeks. SETTING:30 practitioners and outpatient units in Germany specialized in acupuncture treatment. PATIENTS: 300 patients will be included in each study. In the low back pain trial, patients will be included according to clinical diagnosis. In the osteoarthritis pain trial, patients will be included according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Patients are randomly assigned to receive either (1) semi-standardized acupuncture (150 patients), (2) minimal acupuncture at non-acupuncture points (75 patients), or (3) no treatment for two months followed by semi-standardized acupuncture (75 patients, waiting list control). Acupuncture treatment consists of 12 sessions per patient over a period of 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure is the difference between baseline and the end of the 8-week treatment period in the following parameters: pain intensity as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100 mm) in the low back pain trial and by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC) in the osteoarthritis trial. OUTLOOK: The results of these two studies (available in 2004) will provide health care providers and policy makers with the information needed to make scientifically sound assessments of acupuncture therapy. Copyright 2003 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We report on the study design and protocols of two randomized controlled trials (Acupuncture Randomized Trials = ART) that investigate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis of the knee, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether acupuncture is more efficacious than (a) no treatment or (b) minimal acupuncture in the treatment of low back pain and osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Two randomized, controlled, multicenter trials with three treatment arms and a total follow-up time of 52 weeks. SETTING: 30 practitioners and outpatient units in Germany specialized in acupuncture treatment. PATIENTS: 300 patients will be included in each study. In the low back pain trial, patients will be included according to clinical diagnosis. In the osteoarthritis pain trial, patients will be included according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. INTERVENTIONS:Patients are randomly assigned to receive either (1) semi-standardized acupuncture (150 patients), (2) minimal acupuncture at non-acupuncture points (75 patients), or (3) no treatment for two months followed by semi-standardized acupuncture (75 patients, waiting list control). Acupuncture treatment consists of 12 sessions per patient over a period of 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure is the difference between baseline and the end of the 8-week treatment period in the following parameters: pain intensity as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100 mm) in the low back pain trial and by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC) in the osteoarthritis trial. OUTLOOK: The results of these two studies (available in 2004) will provide health care providers and policy makers with the information needed to make scientifically sound assessments of acupuncture therapy. Copyright 2003 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
Authors: Jongbae Park; Klaus Linde; Eric Manheimer; Albrecht Molsberger; Karen Sherman; Caroline Smith; Joseph Sung; Andrew Vickers; Rosa Schnyer Journal: J Altern Complement Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.579
Authors: Eric Manheimer; Ke Cheng; Klaus Linde; Lixing Lao; Junghee Yoo; Susan Wieland; Daniëlle Awm van der Windt; Brian M Berman; Lex M Bouter Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-01-20
Authors: Katherine D Crew; Jillian L Capodice; Heather Greenlee; Arlyn Apollo; Judith S Jacobson; George Raptis; Kimberly Blozie; Alex Sierra; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2007-10-12 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Sidney M Rubinstein; Marienke van Middelkoop; Ton Kuijpers; Raymond Ostelo; Arianne P Verhagen; Michiel R de Boer; Bart W Koes; Maurits W van Tulder Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Max Karner; Frank Brazkiewicz; Andrew Remppis; Joachim Fischer; Oliver Gerlach; Wolfgang Stremmel; Shanmuga Velayutham Subramanian; Henry Johannes Greten Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Eric Manheimer; Ke Cheng; L Susan Wieland; Xueyong Shen; Lixing Lao; Menghu Guo; Brian M Berman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-05-05