Thomas A Wadden1, Elizabeth Didie. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. Wadden@mail.med.upenn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the terms that obese individuals find undesirable or desirable for their doctors to use to describe excess weight of 27.3 kg (i.e., 50 lb) or more. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study surveyed 167 women and 52 men with a mean BMI of 35.3 and 35.1 kg/m(2), respectively, who participated in one of two randomized trials on the treatment of obesity. An additional sample consisted of 105 extremely obese women (i.e., mean BMI of 52.5 kg/m(2)) who sought bariatric surgery. Patients rated the desirability of 11 terms used to describe excess weight. Ratings were made on five-point scales, ranging from very desirable (+2) to neutral (0) to very undesirable (-2). RESULTS: Obese women (N = 167) rated as undesirable to very undesirable the terms fatness (mean rating = -1.8), excess fat (-1.4), obesity (-1.4), and large size (-1.3). These four terms were rated as significantly more (all p < or = 0.001) undesirable than the seven remaining descriptors, which included weight, heaviness, BMI, excess weight, unhealthy body weight, weight problem, and unhealthy BMI. The term weight received a mean rating of 1.1, a value significantly more (all p < or = 0.001) desirable than that for all other descriptors. Highly similar ratings of the terms were provided by obese men (N = 52) and extremely obese women (N = 105). DISCUSSION: Practitioners may wish to avoid the use of potentially derogatory terms such as fatness and obesity when broaching the topic of weight management with patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the terms that obese individuals find undesirable or desirable for their doctors to use to describe excess weight of 27.3 kg (i.e., 50 lb) or more. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study surveyed 167 women and 52 men with a mean BMI of 35.3 and 35.1 kg/m(2), respectively, who participated in one of two randomized trials on the treatment of obesity. An additional sample consisted of 105 extremely obesewomen (i.e., mean BMI of 52.5 kg/m(2)) who sought bariatric surgery. Patients rated the desirability of 11 terms used to describe excess weight. Ratings were made on five-point scales, ranging from very desirable (+2) to neutral (0) to very undesirable (-2). RESULTS:Obesewomen (N = 167) rated as undesirable to very undesirable the terms fatness (mean rating = -1.8), excess fat (-1.4), obesity (-1.4), and large size (-1.3). These four terms were rated as significantly more (all p < or = 0.001) undesirable than the seven remaining descriptors, which included weight, heaviness, BMI, excess weight, unhealthy body weight, weight problem, and unhealthy BMI. The term weight received a mean rating of 1.1, a value significantly more (all p < or = 0.001) desirable than that for all other descriptors. Highly similar ratings of the terms were provided by obesemen (N = 52) and extremely obesewomen (N = 105). DISCUSSION: Practitioners may wish to avoid the use of potentially derogatory terms such as fatness and obesity when broaching the topic of weight management with patients.
Authors: J A Lydecker; K Galbraith; V Ivezaj; M A White; R D Barnes; C A Roberto; C M Grilo Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Sheri Volger; Marion L Vetter; Megan Dougherty; Eva Panigrahi; Rebecca Egner; Victoria Webb; J Graham Thomas; David B Sarwer; Thomas A Wadden Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ronen Rozenblum; Barbara A De La Cruz; Nyryan V Nolido; Ihorma Adighibe; Kristina Secinaro; Katherine D McManus; Florencia Halperin; Jason P Block; David W Bates; Heather J Baer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rebecca L Pearl; Kaylah Walton; Kelly C Allison; Jena Shaw Tronieri; Thomas A Wadden Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Sophie Lewis; Samantha L Thomas; R Warwick Blood; Jim Hyde; David J Castle; Paul A Komesaroff Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390