Literature DB >> 12971703

No benefit from D-amphetamine when added to physiotherapy after stroke: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Thomas Treig1, Cordula Werner, Martin Sachse, Stefan Hesse.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of D-amphetamine on the recovery of activities of daily living and motor functions after stroke,
DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled study,
SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation centre,
SUBJECTS: Twenty-four stroke survivors after a first ischaemic supratentorial stroke within six weeks before study onset, severely to moderately affected, with a Barthel Index (0-100) ranging from 25 to 50, no severe concomitant internal, neurological or psychiatric diseases, and participating in a comprehensive rehabilitation programme of 10-12 weeks,
INTERVENTIONS: Ten sessions with 10 mg D-amphetamine (or placebo) every fourth day totalling 100 mg in a time period of 36 days combined with physical therapy according to the neurodevelopmental concept within 60 minutes after drug intake. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Barthel Index (0-100) served as the primary outcome measure and the Rivermead Motor Assessment Score with its three sections (gross function, leg and trunk, and arm) as the secondary outcome measure, assessed at days 0, 20, 36, 90, 180 and 360.
RESULTS: The two groups did not differ with respect to clinical data and outcome measures at study onset. All patients improved significantly except for arm function over the intervention period and up to day 90 after study onset. The comparison between groups did not reveal any difference at any time; amphetamine-treated patients did not show any increase in motor function or ADL compared with the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: The placebo-controlled study failed to show any effect of D-amphetamine on stroke recovery compared with control. The small number of patients, the timing and content of physical therapy were limiting factors of the present study. Further trials are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12971703     DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr653oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  12 in total

1.  Effects of monoaminergic drugs on training-induced motor cortex plasticity in older adults.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; Samir R Belagaje; Paola Pergami; Marc W Haut; Gerald Hobbs; Cathrin M Buetefisch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Intrastriatal dopamine D1 antagonism dampens neural plasticity in response to motor cortex lesion.

Authors:  E J H Davis; C Coyne; T H McNeill
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Effects of Central Nervous System Drugs on Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  See-Hwee Yeo; Zheng-Jie Ian Lim; Jia Mao; Wai-Ping Yau
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  [Drugs for improvement of motor deficits after stroke].

Authors:  J Liepert
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Amphetamine-enhanced motor training after cervical contusion injury.

Authors:  Laura Krisa; Kelly L Frederick; John C Canver; Scott K Stackhouse; Jed S Shumsky; Marion Murray
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 6.  Central Noradrenergic Agonists in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke-an Overview.

Authors:  Zohi Sternberg; B Schaller
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 7.  Poststroke motor dysfunction and spasticity: novel pharmacological and physical treatment strategies.

Authors:  Stefan Hesse; Cordula Werner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Motor recovery and axonal plasticity with short-term amphetamine after stroke.

Authors:  Catherine M Papadopoulos; Shih-Yen Tsai; Veronica Guillen; Juan Ortega; Gwendolyn L Kartje; William A Wolf
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Poststroke treatment: lost in translation.

Authors:  Deanna L Adkins; Timothy Schallert; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Drugs for stroke recovery: the example of amphetamines.

Authors:  Louise Martinsson; Staffan Eksborg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.