Literature DB >> 12971572

Semiquantitative screening test for G6PD deficiency detects severe deficiency but misses a substantial proportion of partially-deficient females.

O Ainoon1, A Alawiyah, Y H Yu, S K Cheong, N H Hamidah, N Y Boo, M Zaleha.   

Abstract

Neonatal screening for G6PD deficiency has long been established in many countries. The aim of the study was to determine whether the routine semiquantitative fluorescent spot test could detect all cases of G6PD deficiency, including those cases with partial deficiency (residual red cell G6PD activity between 20-60% of normal). We compared the results of G6PD screening by the semiquantitative fluorescent spot test and quantitative G6PD activity assay on a group of 976 neonates and 67 known female heterozygotes. The values for mean G6PD activity of G6PD-normal neonates and 293 healthy adult females were determined. There was no significant difference in the mean normal G6PD activity between the two racial groups in the neonates (669 Malays, 307 Chinese) and in the 293 healthy adult females (150 Malays, 143 Chinese) group. The values for the upper limits of total deficiency (20% of normal residual activity) for neonates and adult females were 2.92 U/gHb and 1.54 U/gHb, respectively. The upper limits of partial deficiency (60% of normal residual activity) were 8.7 U/gHb and 4.6 U/gHb respectively. The prevalence of G6PD deficiency among the male neonates was 5.1% (26) by both the fluorescent spot test and the enzyme assay method. The G6PD activity levels of all 26 cases of G6PD-deficient male neonates were < 20% normal (severe enzyme deficiency). In the female neonate group, the frequency of G6PD deficiency was 1.3% (6 of 472) by the fluorescent spot test and 9.35% (44 of 472) by enzyme assay. The 6 cases diagnosed as deficient by the fluorescent spot test showed severe enzyme deficiency (< 2.92 U/gHb). The remaining 38 female neonates had partial enzyme deficiency and all were misdiagnosed as normal by the fluorescent spot test. In the female heterozygote group, G6PD deficiency was diagnosed in 53% (35 of 67) by enzyme assay and in 7.5% (4 of 67) of cases by the fluorescent spot test. The 4 cases detected by fluorescent spot test had severe enzyme deficiency (<1.6 U/gHb). The remaining 31 (46.3%) cases, diagnosed as normal by fluorescent spot test, showed partial G6PD deficiency. In conclusion, we found that the semiquantitative fluorescent spot test could only diagnose cases of total G6PD deficiency and misclassified the partially-deficient cases as normal. In this study, the overall prevalence of G6PD deficiency was 3.28% by the semiquantitative fluorescent spot test and 7.17% by enzyme assay. This means that 3.9% of G6PD-deficient neonates were missed by the routine fluorescent spot test and they were found to be exclusively females. This study demonstrates a need to use a method that can correctly classify female heterozygotes with partial G6PD deficiency. The clinical implication is that these individuals may be at risk of the hemolytic complication of G6PD deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12971572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health        ISSN: 0125-1562            Impact factor:   0.267


  20 in total

1.  Assessment of G6PD screening program in premature infants in a NICU.

Authors:  R Lam; H Li; M L Nock
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Evaluation of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase stability in stored blood samples.

Authors:  Norunaluwar Jalil; Raja Zahratul Azma; Emida Mohamed; Azlin Ithnin; Hafiza Alauddin; Siti Noor Baya; Ainoon Othman
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.068

3.  Improved quantitative method for G6PD deficiency detection.

Authors:  Yun-Hua Fan; LuAnn Lazenbery; Elizabeth Foster; Felix Duelm; Earl Grant
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Application of genetic screening processor in screening neonatal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.

Authors:  Haixia Miao; Yu Zhang; Kexin Fang; Yezhen Shi; Ting Zhang; Rongqing Chen; Dingwen Wu; Rulai Yang; Xinwen Huang
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-08-25

5.  G6PD testing and radical cure for Plasmodium vivax in Cambodia: A mixed methods implementation study.

Authors:  Soy Ty Kheang; Rosemarie Ridley; Eng Ngeth; Por Ir; Pengby Ngor; Siv Sovannaroth; Dysoley Lek; Somaly Phon; Neeraj Kak; Shunmay Yeung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Prevalence and distribution of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) variants in Thai and Burmese populations in malaria endemic areas of Thailand.

Authors:  Papichaya Phompradit; Jiraporn Kuesap; Wanna Chaijaroenkul; Ronnatrai Rueangweerayut; Yaowaluck Hongkaew; Rujira Yamnuan; Kesara Na-Bangchang
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Suitability of capillary blood for quantitative assessment of G6PD activity and performances of G6PD point-of-care tests.

Authors:  Germana Bancone; Cindy S Chu; Nongnud Chowwiwat; Raweewan Somsakchaicharoen; Pornpimon Wilaisrisak; Prakaykaew Charunwatthana; Pooja Bansil; Sarah McGray; Gonzalo J Domingo; François H Nosten
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Impact of the method of G6PD deficiency assessment on genetic association studies of malaria susceptibility.

Authors:  Marla K Johnson; Tamara D Clark; Denise Njama-Meya; Philip J Rosenthal; Sunil Parikh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genotyping of Malaysian G6PD-deficient neonates by reverse dot blot flow-through hybridisation.

Authors:  M F Alina; R Z Azma; J Norunaluwar; I Azlin; A J Darnina; F C Cheah; A R Noor-Farisah; A A Siti-Hawa; X R K Danny; Noor-Fadzilah Zulkifli; O Ainoon
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Tools for mass screening of G6PD deficiency: validation of the WST8/1-methoxy-PMS enzymatic assay in Uganda.

Authors:  Mariana De Niz; Alice C Eziefula; Lucas Othieno; Edith Mbabazi; Damalie Nabukeera; Emmanuel Ssemmondo; Samuel Gonahasa; Patrick Tumwebaze; Deborah Diliberto; Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi; Sarah G Staedke; Chris Drakeley
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.