Literature DB >> 12971200

Obtaining power or obtaining precision. Delineating methods of sample-size planning.

Ken Kelley1, Scott E Maxwell, Joseph R Rausch.   

Abstract

Sample-size planning historically has been approached from a power analytic perspective in order to have some reasonable probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis. Another approach that is not as well-known is one that emphasizes accuracy in parameter estimation (AIPE). From the AIPE perspective, sample size is chosen such that the expected width of a confidence interval will be sufficiently narrow. The rationales of both approaches are delineated and two procedures are given for estimating the sample size from the AIPE perspective for a two-group mean comparison. One method yields the required sample size, such that the expected width of the computed confidence interval will be the value specified. A modification allows for a defined degree of probabilistic assurance that the width of the computed confidence interval will be no larger than specified. The authors emphasize that the correct conceptualization of sample-size planning depends on the research questions and particular goals of the study.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12971200     DOI: 10.1177/0163278703255242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

1.  Interpreting results of clinical trials: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Ajay K Singh; Ken Kelley; Rajiv Agarwal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Vocal size exaggeration may have contributed to the origins of vocalic complexity.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pisanski; Andrey Anikin; David Reby
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Root Canal Anatomy of Myanmar Permanent Mandibular Incisors in Mandalay Region.

Authors:  Nyan M Aung
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-08-07

4.  Using pilot data to size a two-arm randomized trial to find a nearly optimal personalized treatment strategy.

Authors:  Eric B Laber; Ying-Qi Zhao; Todd Regh; Marie Davidian; Anastasios Tsiatis; Joseph B Stanford; Donglin Zeng; Rui Song; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimation for Better Inference in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Robert J Calin-Jageman; Geoff Cumming
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 6.  Case-control vaccine effectiveness studies: Preparation, design, and enrollment of cases and controls.

Authors:  Jennifer R Verani; Abdullah H Baqui; Claire V Broome; Thomas Cherian; Cheryl Cohen; Jennifer L Farrar; Daniel R Feikin; Michelle J Groome; Rana A Hajjeh; Hope L Johnson; Shabir A Madhi; Kim Mulholland; Katherine L O'Brien; Umesh D Parashar; Manish M Patel; Laura C Rodrigues; Mathuram Santosham; J Anthony Scott; Peter G Smith; Halvor Sommerfelt; Jacqueline E Tate; J Chris Victor; Cynthia G Whitney; Anita K Zaidi; Elizabeth R Zell
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.641

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.