Literature DB >> 129707

Differential function of major histocompatibility complex antigens in T-lymphocyte activation.

F H Bach, M L Bach, P M Sondel.   

Abstract

We have emphasised the functional dichotomy of MHC LD and LD antigens as well as the differences in cellular responses to these antigens. Perhaps in so doing we have failed to stress adequately the similarities that exist. But while the similarities (for example skin graft rejection associated with both K and I region differences) are so very clear, the differences have best allowed our progressive understanding of MHC induced cellular responses from the perspective stressed in this article. Of greatest importance to our understanding of these transplantation antigens are the potentially differential roles for the LD and SD antigens in the complex series of events that are collectively referred to as the "allograft reaction". It has been suggested that these differences may be "merely quantitative". This possibility has been discussed repeatedly in our previous reports on the distinction of LD and SD. In fact, the great bulk of biological phenomena can be reduced to quantitative differences. It would seem to us that sufficient evidence for such differential activity exists to make the LD-SD dichotomy model an heuristically valuable one for purposes of designing future experiments. We have discussed the clinical relevance of this model elsewhere. Many authors have speculated and evidence has been gathered to suggest, that cell surface antigens associated with the MHC are important in developmental and other cell interactions. Some studies have directly addressed the question of the need for MHC compatibility to allow cell interaction to proceed optimally. It thus seems most appropriate that the genetic complex with which we are dealing has been termed the major histocompatibility complex; allowing for the literal interpretation of this term this may be the genetic region that by its influence on "tissue compatibility" may control critical cellular interactions in addition to those observed in allograft reactions. It is the simple good fortune for those whose attention was focused on this complex by transplantation problems to find themselves with a panorama of biological phenomena that require extensive experimental probing and integration, hopefully ultimately leading to an understanding of the MHC in a broader context than has to date been possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 129707     DOI: 10.1038/259273a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  88 in total

1.  Antibody response of mice to chemically induced tumors.

Authors:  J P Brown; J M Klitzman; I Hellström; R C Nowinski; K E Hellström
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Lectin binding and surface glycoprotein pattern of human macrophage populations.

Authors:  H Kreipe; H J Radzun; U Schumacher; M R Parwaresch
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1986

3.  Cytolytic thymus-derived lymphocytes specific for allogeneic stimulator cells crossreact with chemically modified syngeneic cells.

Authors: 
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Biological effects of allogeneic effect factor on T lymphocytes: in vitro induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes manifesting preferential lytic activity against H-2-identical tumor cells.

Authors:  A Altman; T E Bechtold; J M Cardenas; D H Katz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Inhibition of vessel allograft rejection by endothelial removal. Morphologic and ultrastructural changes.

Authors:  M A Galumbeck; F P Sanfilippo; P O Hagen; A V Seaber; J R Urbaniak
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Failure of long surviving, passively enhanced kidney allografts to provoke T-dependent alloimmunity. I. Retransplantation of (AS X AUG)F1 kidneys into secondary AS recipients.

Authors:  J R Batchelor; K I Welsh; A Maynard; H Burgos
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1979-09-19       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Ultrastructural morphometry of blastogenesis I: transformation of small lymphocytes stimulated in vivo with dinitrochlorobenzene.

Authors:  M M Al-Hamdani; M E Atkinson; T M Mayhew
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1979-09-01       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Induction of secondary cytotoxic T lymphocytes by purified HLA-A and HLA-B antigens reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles.

Authors:  V H Engelhard; J L Strominger; M Mescher; S Burakoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  T-cell activation, proliferation, and memory after cardiac transplantation in vivo.

Authors:  N D Jones; A Van Maurik; M Hara; B J Gilot; P J Morris; K J Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The immunological response of Wistar rats to the intracranially implanted C-6 glioma cell line.

Authors:  K M Chiu; J E Harris; J S Kroin; W Slayton; D P Braun
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.