Literature DB >> 12970027

Long-term results of Bentall composite aortic root replacement for ascending aortic aneurysms and dissections.

Sandro Gelsomino1, Giorgio Morocutti, Romeo Frassani, Gianluca Masullo, Paolo Da Col, Leonardo Spedicato, Ugolino Livi.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing aortic root replacement (ARR) with the Bentall procedure.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Cardiothoracic surgery unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1986 and January 2002, 72 patients (mean age 58.3 +/- 12.4 years, 81.9% males) underwent ARR by means of a Bentall operation. Annuloaortic ectasia was the most frequent cause of aortic disease in this series of patients (31 patients; 43.1%), followed by type A dissection (19 patients; 26.3%), atherosclerotic aneurysm (18 patients; 25.1%), and poststenotic dilatation (4 patients; 5.5%). Nine patients (12.5%) had Marfan syndrome, and 10 patients (13.8%) underwent a concomitant replacement of the aortic arch. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 192 months (mean [+/- SD], 86.6 +/- 23.8 months).
RESULTS: The mean 30-day mortality rate was 5.5 +/- 2%. The mean early mortality rate was 21 +/- 4% and 0% (p < 0.001), respectively, in patients with and without dissecting aortic aneurysms. There were two late deaths that were due to a pulmonary neoplasm and a cerebrovascular accident. The mean 16-year survival rate was 91.7 +/- 3.2%. The mean hazard of freedom from death was constant beyond 3 years (8.5 +/- 3.5%). No patient required reoperation. Furthermore, the long-term clinical follow-up was marked by a complete absence of endocarditis, anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, valve thrombosis, and prosthesis failure. Finally, patients showed a significant improvement in mean New York Heart Association functional status (1.3 +/- 0.1; p < 0.001 [postoperatively vs preoperatively]).
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the late results of the Bentall operation were satisfactory. Our findings confirm that this technique still represents the procedure of choice for ARR with coronary reimplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12970027     DOI: 10.1378/chest.124.3.984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

1.  Surgical Management of Aortic Root Dilatation with Advanced Aortic Regurgitation: Bentall Operation versus Valve-sparing Procedure.

Authors:  Ju Yong Lim; Joon Bum Kim; Sung-Ho Jung; Suk Jung Choo; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-06-07

2.  Delayed Infective Endocarditis with Mycotic Aneurysm Rupture below the Mechanical Valved Conduit after the Bentall Procedure.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Chen; Michael Y Chen; Wei-Hsian Yin; Jeng Wei; Ji-Hung Wang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  The evidence in a Bentall procedure with Valsalva graft: is this standard of care?

Authors:  Ziv Beckerman; Bradley G Leshnower; LaRonica McPherson; Jose N Binongo; Yi Lasanajak; Edward P Chen
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-10

4.  The Left Main Complication of the Bentall's Procedure.

Authors:  Malcolm Anastasius; Graham Hillis; John Yiannikas
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2014-01-02

5.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Iatrogenic Right Coronary Artery Dissection Post Bentall Procedure: A Case Report and Minireview.

Authors:  Sameer Saleem; Mubbasher A Syed; Khalid Changal; Abdulelah Nuqali; Mujeeb Sheikh
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-29

6.  A simple modified Bentall technique for surgical reconstruction of the aortic root - short and long term outcomes.

Authors:  Pouya Nezafati; Ali Shomali; Mohammad Hassan Nezafati
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.