Karl R Hansen1, Jamie L Morris, Angela C Thyer, Michael R Soules. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA. krhansen@u.wahsington.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of intercycle and interobserver variability in antral follicle (AF) count and their impact on stimulation quality in IVF. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of the impact on AF count of GnRH agonist down-regulation and interobserver variability. Retrospective evaluation of intercycle variability in AF count. SETTING: University ART clinic. PATIENT(S): Twenty subjects were used to evaluate the effect of GnRH agonist down-regulation upon AF count; six of whom were used to evaluate interobserver variability. Fifty patients experiencing two or three cycles of IVF within a 1-year interval. INTERVENTION(S): Transvaginal ultrasound exams before and after down-regulation with a GnRH agonist. Videotaped day-3 transvaginal ultrasound exams. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): [1] Intercycle and interobserver variability in antral follicle count. [2] Oocytes retrieved, peak estradiol, gonadotropin dose, duration of stimulation and cancellation rates. RESULT(S): There is moderate intercycle and interobserver variability in AF counts. GnRH agonist down-regulation does not significantly change AF count. In infertility patients undergoing IVF, paired analysis between the low- and high-AF count cycles did not show a difference in quality of stimulation or cycle cancellation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Within an individual patient, higher AF count in a given cycle was not predictive of better stimulation compared with the case of a lower count cycle.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of intercycle and interobserver variability in antral follicle (AF) count and their impact on stimulation quality in IVF. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of the impact on AF count of GnRH agonist down-regulation and interobserver variability. Retrospective evaluation of intercycle variability in AF count. SETTING: University ART clinic. PATIENT(S): Twenty subjects were used to evaluate the effect of GnRH agonist down-regulation upon AF count; six of whom were used to evaluate interobserver variability. Fifty patients experiencing two or three cycles of IVF within a 1-year interval. INTERVENTION(S): Transvaginal ultrasound exams before and after down-regulation with a GnRH agonist. Videotaped day-3 transvaginal ultrasound exams. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): [1] Intercycle and interobserver variability in antral follicle count. [2] Oocytes retrieved, peak estradiol, gonadotropin dose, duration of stimulation and cancellation rates. RESULT(S): There is moderate intercycle and interobserver variability in AF counts. GnRH agonist down-regulation does not significantly change AF count. In infertilitypatients undergoing IVF, paired analysis between the low- and high-AF count cycles did not show a difference in quality of stimulation or cycle cancellation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Within an individual patient, higher AF count in a given cycle was not predictive of better stimulation compared with the case of a lower count cycle.
Authors: Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers Journal: Menopause Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Siobán D Harlow; Margery Gass; Janet E Hall; Roger Lobo; Pauline Maki; Robert W Rebar; Sherry Sherman; Patrick M Sluss; Tobie J de Villiers Journal: Climacteric Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 3.005
Authors: Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 5.211