Literature DB >> 12969289

Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella spp. isolates from US cattle in feedlots in 1999 and 2000.

D A Dargatz1, P J Fedorka-Cray, S R Ladely, C A Kopral, K E Ferris, M L Headrick.   

Abstract

AIMS: Faecal samples from cattle in US feedlots were evaluated for the presence of Salmonella. When Salmonella isolates were recovered the antimicrobial resistance patterns were determined. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Faecal samples were collected from pen floors in 73 feedlots in 12 states during the period from October 1999 to September 2000. Pens of cattle selected for sampling were those that had been in the feedlot for the shortest period of time, the longest period of time and a randomly selected pen from the remaining pens. Faecal samples were cultured for Salmonella spp. and all Salmonella isolates were categorized by serotype. The susceptibilities of all isolates were determined using a panel of 17 antimicrobials. Overall, 6.3% (654/10,417) of the samples cultured positive for Salmonella spp. and 22.2% (94/422) of pens and 50.7% (37/73) of feedlots had one or more positive samples. There was little difference in the proportion of positive samples from short-fed (6.1%, 212/3482), random (6.4%, 217/3400) and long-fed (6.4%, 224/3485) pens of cattle. One of two pens of cattle that could not be attributed to a pen type had a single positive sample (2.0%, 1/50). Samples collected during the period of April to June (6.8%, 209/3054) and July to September (11.4%, 286/2500) were more likely to be positive than those collected during October to December (4.0%, 73/1838) and January to March (2.8%, 86/3025). The most common serotypes of Salmonella were dissimilar from those that are typically seen in human illness and cattle illness. The majority of isolates (62.8%, 441/702) were sensitive to all of the antimicrobials tested. Resistance was most frequently observed to tetracycline (35.9%, 252/702) followed by streptomycin (11.1%, 78/702), ampicillin (10.4%, 73/702) and chloramphenicol (10.4%, 73/702). Multiple resistance (resistance to > or =2 antimicrobials) was observed for 11.7% (82/702) of the isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: Salmonella was isolated at low frequency from faeces of feedlot cattle and the serotypes were not those commonly associated with human illness. In addition most of the Salmonella isolates were sensitive to all the antimicrobials tested. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study contributes to understanding the ecology of Salmonella in cattle feedlots and the prevalence of resistance among potential food-borne pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12969289     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02034.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  14 in total

1.  Geographical and temporal dissemination of salmonellae isolated from domestic animal hosts in the Culiacan Valley, Mexico.

Authors:  Maribel Jiménez; Jaime Martínez-Urtaza; Cristobal Chaidez
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Salmonella, Campylobacter and Enterococcus spp.: their antimicrobial resistance profiles and their spatial relationships in a synoptic study of the Upper Oconee River basin.

Authors:  R J Meinersmann; M E Berrang; C R Jackson; P Fedorka-Cray; S Ladely; E Little; J G Frye; B Mattsson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from slaughtered cattle in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Sefinew Alemu; Bayleyegn Molla Zewde
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Diversity of multidrug-resistant salmonella enterica strains associated with cattle at harvest in the United States.

Authors:  Dayna M Brichta-Harhay; Terrance M Arthur; Joseph M Bosilevac; Norasak Kalchayanand; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Analysis of Salmonella enterica Isolated from a Mixed-Use Watershed in Georgia, USA: Antimicrobial Resistance, Serotype Diversity, and Genetic Relatedness to Human Isolates.

Authors:  Sohyun Cho; Lari M Hiott; Sandra L House; Tiffanie A Woodley; Elizabeth A McMillan; Poonam Sharma; John B Barrett; Eric S Adams; Joshua M Brandenburg; Kelley B Hise; Jacob M Bateman McDonald; Elizabeth A Ottesen; Erin K Lipp; Charlene R Jackson; Jonathan G Frye
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 5.005

6.  Salmonella enterica burden in harvest-ready cattle populations from the southern high plains of the United States.

Authors:  David J Kunze; Guy H Loneragan; Tammy M Platt; Mark F Miller; Thomas E Besser; Mohammad Koohmaraie; Tyler Stephens; Mindy M Brashears
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Salmonella enterica serotypes recovered from pens of commercial feedlot cattle using different types of composite samples.

Authors:  Mohammad Jahangir Alam; David Renter; Ethel Taylor; Diana Mina; Rodney Moxley; David Smith
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination on hides and carcasses of cull cattle presented for slaughter in the United States: an evaluation of prevalence and bacterial loads by immunomagnetic separation and direct plating methods.

Authors:  Dayna M Brichta-Harhay; Michael N Guerini; Terrance M Arthur; Joseph M Bosilevac; Norasak Kalchayanand; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Mohammad Koohmaraie
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Antimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production.

Authors:  Andrew Cameron; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-12

10.  Potential associations between fecal shedding of Salmonella in feedlot cattle treated for apparent respiratory disease and subsequent adverse health outcomes.

Authors:  Mohammad Jahangir Alam; David G Renter; Samuel E Ives; Daniel U Thomson; Michael W Sanderson; Larry C Hollis; Tiruvoor G Nagaraja
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.